<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two Unions w/ Two outcomes. in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634202#M21133</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: briancoward&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yep... the same in both.&amp;nbsp; I have noticed when I copy the routine over, initially, the [Segment] field shows up correctly.&amp;nbsp; I modify the "Expression" in the Make Feature Layer tool to select the different polygons and when I check the Feature Class to Feature Class on the other side of the Union the [Segment] field still shows up.&amp;nbsp; When I change the output name of the Union to match the new selection... the [Segment] field goes missing and the order changes to alphabetical.&amp;nbsp; Not sure if that helps�?�&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-09T16:40:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two Unions w/ Two outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634198#M21129</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've got a routine in model builder that's working perfectly and when I copy that routine over as a base and begin to change the parameters to create different features it�??s changing the available fields at the Union.&amp;nbsp; The source files are exactly the same but the outcome from the Union is different.&amp;nbsp; I've tried changing the output location, name, creating a new union in the model, and countless other changes.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know how you can have a different outcome on a Union with the same source data?&amp;nbsp; And more importantly... how can I correct this?&amp;nbsp; Here are a few screen shots.&amp;nbsp; Appreciate the help,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brian&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634198#M21129</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrianCoward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T15:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Unions w/ Two outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634199#M21130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you sure the fields are actually missing? It looks like many of the fields you highlighted are just in a different order lower down the list. Is it possible that the order of the Union inputs have been changed?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634199#M21130</guid>
      <dc:creator>DarrenWiens2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T15:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Unions w/ Two outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634200#M21131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: briancoward&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;dkwiens,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I do have way to many fields in there but no... after looking through another time it doesn't appear that the [Segment] field is coming through.&amp;nbsp; The fact that it is, somewhat, alphabetizing the order of the fields in a different way from the Union with the [Segment] field is odd though.&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure what it means... but it would help if the outcomes were consistent.&amp;nbsp; Any other ideas?&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:43:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634200#M21131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T15:43:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Unions w/ Two outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634201#M21132</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When you look in the two Union tools, is the order of the inputs the same (e.g. COWS first, CMA second)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634201#M21132</guid>
      <dc:creator>DarrenWiens2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T15:51:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two Unions w/ Two outcomes.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634202#M21133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: briancoward&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yep... the same in both.&amp;nbsp; I have noticed when I copy the routine over, initially, the [Segment] field shows up correctly.&amp;nbsp; I modify the "Expression" in the Make Feature Layer tool to select the different polygons and when I check the Feature Class to Feature Class on the other side of the Union the [Segment] field still shows up.&amp;nbsp; When I change the output name of the Union to match the new selection... the [Segment] field goes missing and the order changes to alphabetical.&amp;nbsp; Not sure if that helps�?�&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/two-unions-w-two-outcomes/m-p/634202#M21133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-09T16:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

