<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Weighted Overlay Tool - Is this correct? in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/weighted-overlay-tool-is-this-correct/m-p/405573#M13734</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When you run weighted overlay you are averaging out values based on weight. so 1 overlayed with a 4 can end up a 2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;EDIT: I would probably post this under Spatial Analyst forum!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AmyKlug</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-20T15:33:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weighted Overlay Tool - Is this correct?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/weighted-overlay-tool-is-this-correct/m-p/405572#M13733</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have used the weighted overlay tool to produce a suitability raster. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have reclassified all of my datasets to a suitability scale of 1 - 5 (1 being least suitable, and 5 being most suitable). However, when I run the weighted overlay tool, my suitability image only shows values for 2 - 5. Is this because there just are no areas with suitability value of 1, or have I made a mistake somewhere? When I run another image through the model, I get values for 2 and 3, but not 1, 4 and 5.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have input all of my reclassified rasters, given each a scale value of 1 - 5 (matching my suitability values) and used the evaluation scale of "1 to 5 by 1". Is this correct? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/weighted-overlay-tool-is-this-correct/m-p/405572#M13733</guid>
      <dc:creator>KerryThomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-20T12:22:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted Overlay Tool - Is this correct?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/weighted-overlay-tool-is-this-correct/m-p/405573#M13734</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When you run weighted overlay you are averaging out values based on weight. so 1 overlayed with a 4 can end up a 2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;EDIT: I would probably post this under Spatial Analyst forum!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/weighted-overlay-tool-is-this-correct/m-p/405573#M13734</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmyKlug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-20T15:33:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

