<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Batch Geoprocessing Issues in Geoprocessing Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323867#M11403</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've recently upgraded to ArcGIS 10.5 from 10.3.1 and am experiencing some issues associated with running geoprocessing tools as a batch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first issue is that when I run the tools as a batch process they will no longer run in the background, even though background geoprocessing is enabled. I never had this issue in 10.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second issue is that if I have an error with the batch processing, I normally fix the error/issue that was causing the error and reopen the batch processing input window from the results so I don't have to reconfigure the window. However when I open the window in 10.5 only the first row is completely filled out and the rest of the rows output feature class is greyed out, like in the attached image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last issue minor issue is that the batch process only outputs/adds into the map the first row/input of the batch process unlike in 10.3.1 when it adds all the outputs to the current map.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RussellTess</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-26T16:19:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Batch Geoprocessing Issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323867#M11403</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've recently upgraded to ArcGIS 10.5 from 10.3.1 and am experiencing some issues associated with running geoprocessing tools as a batch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first issue is that when I run the tools as a batch process they will no longer run in the background, even though background geoprocessing is enabled. I never had this issue in 10.3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second issue is that if I have an error with the batch processing, I normally fix the error/issue that was causing the error and reopen the batch processing input window from the results so I don't have to reconfigure the window. However when I open the window in 10.5 only the first row is completely filled out and the rest of the rows output feature class is greyed out, like in the attached image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last issue minor issue is that the batch process only outputs/adds into the map the first row/input of the batch process unlike in 10.3.1 when it adds all the outputs to the current map.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323867#M11403</guid>
      <dc:creator>RussellTess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T16:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Batch Geoprocessing Issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323868#M11404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you installed &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/analyze/executing-tools/64bit-background.htm"&gt;BG x64 processing&lt;/A&gt; in your update? Did you have it before?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The x64 GP does not support .mdb format. Maybe batch is being smart about the inputs and not letting you run in the background because of the .mdb inputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know about the other issues you're running into. I have had issues with x64 bg processing not communicating layers back to ArcMap very well, but you said background processing isn't even working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Batch is useful but it's kind of older (9x)&amp;nbsp;functionality that can be replaced with&amp;nbsp;model iteration, which allows you to batch name the outputs. &amp;nbsp;(This saves a lot of time if you have a lot of datasets to process!) &amp;nbsp;If you're not familiar with model iteration, it is worth looking into -- in some ways it is much more powerful than batch processing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/analyze/modelbuilder/a-quick-tour-of-using-iterators-for-iteration-looping-.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/analyze/modelbuilder/a-quick-tour-of-using-iterators-for-iteration-looping-.htm"&gt;A quick tour of using iterators—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 14:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323868#M11404</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-13T14:21:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Batch Geoprocessing Issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323869#M11405</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your "Issue #2" may be related to this bug in 10.4,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/bugs/nimbus/QlVHLTAwMDA5NjI0MQ==" title="http://support.esri.com/bugs/nimbus/QlVHLTAwMDA5NjI0MQ==" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;BUG-000096241: Running batch processing does not add all the featur..&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which has been marked as "Not In Current Product Plan". &amp;nbsp;I would guess that the rationale is the best solution for users is to move to &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/group/1218" target="_blank"&gt;Model Builder&lt;/A&gt;‌ instead of batch for these workflows, or use the ArcMap built-in Python window to loop things. Recently I've been discovering how handy the Python window can be for things like this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't agree with their decision, file an incident with tech support - the squeaky wheel gets the grease!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's an example of using the python window to do the&amp;nbsp;Copy Features batch operation in your screenshot:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;import&lt;/SPAN&gt; os
&lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;import&lt;/SPAN&gt; arcpy
arcpy&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;env&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;workspace &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"E:\\AGOOP\\Upload3.mdb"&lt;/SPAN&gt;
outwk &lt;SPAN class="operator token"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"Database Connections\\plsaa435"&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;for&lt;/SPAN&gt; fc &lt;SPAN class="keyword token"&gt;in&lt;/SPAN&gt; arcpy&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;ListFeatureClasses&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="string token"&gt;"*_AGP"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; arcpy&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;CopyFeatures_management&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;fc&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; os&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;path&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;join&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;outwk&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;,&lt;/SPAN&gt; fc&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;‍‍‍‍‍‍&lt;SPAN class="punctuation token"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geoprocessing-questions/batch-geoprocessing-issues/m-p/323869#M11405</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-11T15:23:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

