<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Potential Problems Truncating/Deleting Record in an SDE layer from oracle creating Orphans in Geodatabase Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/potential-problems-truncating-deleting-record-in/m-p/766296#M654</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You &lt;STRONG&gt;are&lt;/STRONG&gt; setting yourself up for issues in the future, but it &lt;STRONG&gt;is&lt;/STRONG&gt; possible to maintain a simple feature class exclusively from SQL.&amp;nbsp; "Simple feature class" means:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Table is registered with ArcSDE with a USER-set registered rowid (sdelayer -o register -C objid,USER...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class is NOT versioned&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class is NOT archived&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class does NOT participate in geodatabase behaviors (relationship classes, feature datasets,...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;In essense, just a stripped down, native table with geometry (SDE.ST_GEOMETRY or MMDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's theoretically possible to not trash tables with SDE-set rowids, if you honor all the restrictions in ID allocation, but that would likely tempt you into something which would regularly corrupt your geodatabase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-22T15:24:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Potential Problems Truncating/Deleting Record in an SDE layer from oracle creating Orphans</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/potential-problems-truncating-deleting-record-in/m-p/766295#M653</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For various reasons we have the need to delete and insert&lt;BR /&gt;records directly through Oracle SQL for a feature class with spatial data.&amp;nbsp; While exploring this option I have been&lt;BR /&gt;warned against it because there may be orphan records that are created through&lt;BR /&gt;ESRI that will not be created/deleted as needed when these actions are not&lt;BR /&gt;completed through the GIS tool.&amp;nbsp; Is this&lt;BR /&gt;the case? If so, are there additional updates that could also be done directly&lt;BR /&gt;in Oracle to account for this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have performed a test on a small dataset to ensure that&lt;BR /&gt;we can complete the insert/delete/truncate commands in Oracle and still have&lt;BR /&gt;the dataset be readable through ArcGIS, no issues there.&amp;nbsp; Just want to make sure we are not setting&lt;BR /&gt;ourselves up for issues in the future by doing this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your input in this matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/potential-problems-truncating-deleting-record-in/m-p/766295#M653</guid>
      <dc:creator>keithbickers1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-21T20:34:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Potential Problems Truncating/Deleting Record in an SDE layer from oracle creating Orphans</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/potential-problems-truncating-deleting-record-in/m-p/766296#M654</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You &lt;STRONG&gt;are&lt;/STRONG&gt; setting yourself up for issues in the future, but it &lt;STRONG&gt;is&lt;/STRONG&gt; possible to maintain a simple feature class exclusively from SQL.&amp;nbsp; "Simple feature class" means:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Table is registered with ArcSDE with a USER-set registered rowid (sdelayer -o register -C objid,USER...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class is NOT versioned&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class is NOT archived&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Feature class does NOT participate in geodatabase behaviors (relationship classes, feature datasets,...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;In essense, just a stripped down, native table with geometry (SDE.ST_GEOMETRY or MMDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's theoretically possible to not trash tables with SDE-set rowids, if you honor all the restrictions in ID allocation, but that would likely tempt you into something which would regularly corrupt your geodatabase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/potential-problems-truncating-deleting-record-in/m-p/766296#M654</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-22T15:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

