<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: To Version or Not To Version in Geodatabase Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762461#M545</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you follow a typical database design structure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JeffDavis7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-11T16:22:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762457#M541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to get some advice from the GeoNet Community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under what circumstances should you consider employing the use of versioning in your database structure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762457#M541</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffDavis7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T12:19:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762458#M542</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&amp;nbsp; If you have multiple users....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp; you don't want to have separate copies of your gdb&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp; you&amp;nbsp; need to accommodate different workflows&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&amp;nbsp; you do the webgis stuff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/overview-of-versioning-in-arcgis-pro.htm" title="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/overview-of-versioning-in-arcgis-pro.htm"&gt;Overview of versioning—Geodatabases | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So for me, it is not relevant since I am on my own, I prefer separate copies, I am set in my ways and I don't do the web stuff &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/wink.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762458#M542</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T12:30:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762459#M543</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dan.&amp;nbsp; Made me laugh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aside from myself there is only one other person in our shop that will be editing.&amp;nbsp; I don't see that changing.&amp;nbsp; I have no problem with separate copies of the gdb.&amp;nbsp; I am the administrator for ArcGIS Online and am the only one who will be publishing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The previous administrator created versioning.&amp;nbsp; I believe this was done because they expected more departments to participate but that did not happen.&amp;nbsp; I just can't seem to see its necessity given our current state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762459#M543</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffDavis7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T12:41:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762460#M544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another reason is if you want to do What If cases.&amp;nbsp; For example if you are planning out a new layout for a park or shopping center, you can created multiple versions for each proposed layout.&amp;nbsp; Since they are independent of each other until you reconcile and post, you can keep each layout as its own version.&amp;nbsp; Once the decision makers choose an option, you can post that version and delete the rest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addition, the edit undo and redo tools use a version environment to work.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise any changes are posted to the base table once they are made.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762460#M544</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinDunlop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T13:27:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762461#M545</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you follow a typical database design structure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762461#M545</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffDavis7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T16:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762462#M546</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of my work uses gdbs to store results.&amp;nbsp; I have rarely had the need to get into this type of scenario...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/view-and-edit-fields-domains-and-subtypes.htm" title="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/view-and-edit-fields-domains-and-subtypes.htm"&gt;Fields, domains, and subtypes—Geodatabases | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The end use of your data should control your workflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 16:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762462#M546</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T16:41:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: To Version or Not To Version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762463#M547</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure about your environment but another consideration is performance. Unversioned data is much faster as there are fewer "other" tables for the DB Engines to sort through.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/to-version-or-not-to-version/m-p/762463#M547</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterKing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-11T19:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

