<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Database Versioning Best Practice in Geodatabase Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754148#M409</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A decision on which one to choose may depend on factors like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How much edits do the editors do on a daily basis&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How frequently is Reconcile\Post, deletion of versions, compress done&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess, if it is feasible, just having one version per editor will be sufficient and easy to manage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Asrujit_SenGupta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-21T19:06:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Database Versioning Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754147#M408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We currently have 10 users that are working in our enterprise environment on a daily basis.&amp;nbsp; Our current versioning workflow is to create a new version for each project that we work on.&amp;nbsp; Between the 10 users, this can total out to about 10-15 new versions every single day.&amp;nbsp; You can imagine how quickly our version count climbs rapidly with this workflow.&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is whether or not it is best practices to simply have a version for each user that they perform all of their own edits in, or is it better to seclude the projects themselves as we have been doing?&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any other best practice advice is much appreciated as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754147#M408</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T16:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Database Versioning Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754148#M409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A decision on which one to choose may depend on factors like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How much edits do the editors do on a daily basis&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How frequently is Reconcile\Post, deletion of versions, compress done&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess, if it is feasible, just having one version per editor will be sufficient and easy to manage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754148#M409</guid>
      <dc:creator>Asrujit_SenGupta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T19:06:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Database Versioning Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754149#M410</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Asrujit,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I'll add comments to your bullet points below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"How much edits do the editors do on a daily basis"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The users are creating new versions for each respective project that they do.&amp;nbsp; Each project has 5 feature classes that have new data added to them.&amp;nbsp; The users are creating brand new designs for proposal to our customers, which can total up to miles of fiber, anywhere from 1-1000 termination point sites, and various generalized points along the route for costing purposes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"How frequently is Reconcile\Post, deletion of versions, compress done"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The users reconcile and post their edits as the last task for each and every project they work on.&amp;nbsp; The create their design, run some customized tools, verify the tools worked accordingly, and then reconcile and post back to the default version.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Essentially versions are &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;deleted&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; once users begin complaining of diminished performance.&amp;nbsp; I've seen upwards of 500+ versions before. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I compress along the same timeline as the last comment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*EDIT* I removed "created" and added "deleted" in the above statements.&amp;nbsp; I used the wrong wording.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/database-versioning-best-practice/m-p/754149#M410</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T19:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

