<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lost edited data when posting the version to the DEFAULT version in Geodatabase Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/lost-edited-data-when-posting-the-version-to-the/m-p/785069#M1741</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ruben,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sorry to hear of the recent issues with edit loss. Can you describe in a bit more detail the current versioning structure of the database- IE is this a flat version tree with a single edit/transaction version off of the Default version, or do you have other edit versions in existence as well? Any intermediate (QA/QC versions) between the edit versions and default? Are there any other long-standing edit versions that were created long ago that still exist? Any additional information you can provide about the versioning structure and workflow of the reconcile / post process (were&amp;nbsp;conflicts detected by object or by attribute?) would be helpful to&amp;nbsp;theorize how edits may have disappeared.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rex&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RexRobichaux2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-14T16:13:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lost edited data when posting the version to the DEFAULT version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/lost-edited-data-when-posting-the-version-to-the/m-p/785068#M1740</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Enterprise Geodatabase system features&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Dbms&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;: Oracle 11gR2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Server&lt;/STRONG&gt;: ArcGIS Server 10.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Client&lt;/STRONG&gt;: ArcMap 10.0 Service Pack 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Third Party Application:&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;ArcFM 10.0.1 SP1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Context of the Problem:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;It was created an editing version worked on it and saved the version without problems. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Then i reconciled equally without fail and resolved the conflicts that were found.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Subsequently, the posting of the current version was made to the DEFAULT and at the moment of reviewing the changes; It was identified that 300 modified attributes of a Gdb table were not present in the official DEFAULT version of the database.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;ArcMap did not report any errors and the fault has been presented in the versions of two user accounts that have equal editing permission, in which each one publishes its respective Dataset.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;When i searching the internet I do not encounter similar failure, for which reason I request moderately support or guidance to find the solution of the problem.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 21:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/lost-edited-data-when-posting-the-version-to-the/m-p/785068#M1740</guid>
      <dc:creator>rubencalero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-01T21:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lost edited data when posting the version to the DEFAULT version</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/lost-edited-data-when-posting-the-version-to-the/m-p/785069#M1741</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ruben,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sorry to hear of the recent issues with edit loss. Can you describe in a bit more detail the current versioning structure of the database- IE is this a flat version tree with a single edit/transaction version off of the Default version, or do you have other edit versions in existence as well? Any intermediate (QA/QC versions) between the edit versions and default? Are there any other long-standing edit versions that were created long ago that still exist? Any additional information you can provide about the versioning structure and workflow of the reconcile / post process (were&amp;nbsp;conflicts detected by object or by attribute?) would be helpful to&amp;nbsp;theorize how edits may have disappeared.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rex&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/geodatabase-questions/lost-edited-data-when-posting-the-version-to-the/m-p/785069#M1741</guid>
      <dc:creator>RexRobichaux2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-14T16:13:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

