<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic UN Subnetwork Summary Fields in Gas and Pipeline Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692705#M555</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Several summaries are defined for the system and pressure tiers in UPDM, but they're not being calculated when I update the subnetworks.&amp;nbsp; I applied the UN patch to no effect.&amp;nbsp; Is there something I'm missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 20:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-20T20:34:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UN Subnetwork Summary Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692705#M555</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Several summaries are defined for the system and pressure tiers in UPDM, but they're not being calculated when I update the subnetworks.&amp;nbsp; I applied the UN patch to no effect.&amp;nbsp; Is there something I'm missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 20:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692705#M555</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T20:34:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UN Subnetwork Summary Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692706#M556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the subnetLine features being generated with the summary fields as Null?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 20:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692706#M556</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulLeBlanc1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T20:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UN Subnetwork Summary Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692707#M557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No they're coming out as 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 20:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692707#M557</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-20T20:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UN Subnetwork Summary Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692708#M558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've submitted a tech support request case #02239285.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692708#M558</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-27T15:30:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UN Subnetwork Summary Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692709#M559</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Taking a closer look at the subnetwork properties, I realized that the out-of-the-box valve and meter counts in UPDM use invalid asset types.&amp;nbsp; After updating the asset types to correct values, I'm getting the counts.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For MAOP, I switched the function from MIN to MAX, because services do not have MAOP populated.&amp;nbsp; I found the aggregated lines property to be confusing, but I think I have it straight now.&amp;nbsp; If I exclude services from aggregated lines, they don't contribute to the subnet line geometry, but they still contribute to summary attributes.&amp;nbsp; However, it looks as though I can set a filter in the summary to exclude them, though I'll have to create an asset group network attribute; I'll do some more playing around with that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/un-subnetwork-summary-fields/m-p/692709#M559</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-18T19:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

