<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices in Gas and Pipeline Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553813#M406</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I create a rule for test lead wire to valve, there must be a reference to terminals.&amp;nbsp; Those terminals are occupied elsewhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-23T16:56:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553811#M404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a Gas UPDM issue.&amp;nbsp; We have a great number of CP test points connected to valves, and this has stumped me.&amp;nbsp; I can create a new terminal configuration, but there are times when a device acts as a device, and times when it merely acts as a junction, depending on the subnet tier.&amp;nbsp; I invite Esri&amp;nbsp;and the Gas Utility Community to analyze this situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553811#M404</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T12:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553812#M405</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Can you explain the problem some more? &amp;nbsp;Are you looking to connect the Test Point to the valve via a Test Lead Wire?&amp;nbsp; I just looked we are missing that rule from the model, but makes sense to allow it.&amp;nbsp; That valve will need a value of Traceable in the Cathodic Protection Traceability field so it is not a barrier to the CP network.&amp;nbsp; This can be set via the material or the override field.&amp;nbsp; The test lead wire has a category of CP Only, which is a barrier to the gas network, so the test point is not included in the gas system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553812#M405</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T12:42:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553813#M406</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I create a rule for test lead wire to valve, there must be a reference to terminals.&amp;nbsp; Those terminals are occupied elsewhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553813#M406</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T16:56:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553814#M407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It just occurred to me that it may be possible for more than one line feature to be assigned to a valve terminal.&amp;nbsp; If that's the case, then there may not be a problem after all.&amp;nbsp; I'll look into that possibility after my latest round of experiments, which take considerable time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:02:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553814#M407</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T17:02:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553815#M408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well here I go thinking myself around a catnip mouse again.&amp;nbsp; Even if I can attach a test lead wire to a controllable valve in a pipe network, what happens if the valve is closed to gas?&amp;nbsp; It should still be able to trace for conductivity.&amp;nbsp; That's where the "cptraceability"&amp;nbsp;field comes in, I guess.&amp;nbsp; I need to do some more playing around with this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553815#M408</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T19:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553816#M409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great Question.&amp;nbsp; You can close the valve and the CP network does not care. The DeviceStatus Network Attribute is not used in the subnetwork definition for CP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553816#M409</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-23T19:30:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Dualistic Nature of Devices</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553817#M410</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I verified that I can have a pipe and test lead wire connected to the same terminal of a controlling device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/the-dualistic-nature-of-devices/m-p/553817#M410</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-29T22:14:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

