<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic which to use, ArcGIS Pipeline Referncing ext. or Utility Network ext.? in Gas and Pipeline Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/which-to-use-arcgis-pipeline-referncing-ext-or/m-p/366097#M307</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To build hydrocarbon transmission pipelines network and then enrich that with different routes which represent different features and events like the inspection anomalies, scrapable segments, etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I came across the APR extension. It seems to be the&amp;nbsp;needed tool along with Data Review ext. to construct this network. However, I also came across the UN tool.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-&amp;nbsp;What is the difference between this extension and APR extension?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-&amp;nbsp;In order to build a hydrocarbon transmission pipelines network, would the UN tool be the preferred one or I should use&amp;nbsp;APR?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0px; min-height: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3-&amp;nbsp;I'm planning to&amp;nbsp;use UPDM 2019&amp;nbsp;and migrate all current GIS features and attribute to this model; then modify according to our need. This is because our current Pipeline GIS system is developed based on Ad-hoc database structure.&amp;nbsp;However, I went through several discussions which waring from the effect of breaking UPDM database model integrity once is modified. Based on that, is it a good choice to use this module? and does it&amp;nbsp;accommodate on-line data transmitted&amp;nbsp;from the filed like sensors signals that pushed to the database either on time intervals or per occurred events&amp;nbsp;(e.g. leak alarm) which will be part of the events routes?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate all&amp;nbsp;feedbacks. Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ThamerTarabzouni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-20T12:52:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>which to use, ArcGIS Pipeline Referncing ext. or Utility Network ext.?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/which-to-use-arcgis-pipeline-referncing-ext-or/m-p/366097#M307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To build hydrocarbon transmission pipelines network and then enrich that with different routes which represent different features and events like the inspection anomalies, scrapable segments, etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I came across the APR extension. It seems to be the&amp;nbsp;needed tool along with Data Review ext. to construct this network. However, I also came across the UN tool.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-&amp;nbsp;What is the difference between this extension and APR extension?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-&amp;nbsp;In order to build a hydrocarbon transmission pipelines network, would the UN tool be the preferred one or I should use&amp;nbsp;APR?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0px; min-height: 8pt;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3-&amp;nbsp;I'm planning to&amp;nbsp;use UPDM 2019&amp;nbsp;and migrate all current GIS features and attribute to this model; then modify according to our need. This is because our current Pipeline GIS system is developed based on Ad-hoc database structure.&amp;nbsp;However, I went through several discussions which waring from the effect of breaking UPDM database model integrity once is modified. Based on that, is it a good choice to use this module? and does it&amp;nbsp;accommodate on-line data transmitted&amp;nbsp;from the filed like sensors signals that pushed to the database either on time intervals or per occurred events&amp;nbsp;(e.g. leak alarm) which will be part of the events routes?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate all&amp;nbsp;feedbacks. Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/which-to-use-arcgis-pipeline-referncing-ext-or/m-p/366097#M307</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThamerTarabzouni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-20T12:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: which to use, ArcGIS Pipeline Referncing ext. or Utility Network ext.?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/which-to-use-arcgis-pipeline-referncing-ext-or/m-p/366098#M308</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thamer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I don't work for Esri but it sounds like most of your concerns about maintaining multiple models&amp;nbsp;are handled with the next release of UPDM, ArcGIS Pro, and ArcGIS Enterprise that should be coming out in the next week or so but I recommend you check out this thread from Esri (&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/community/electric-and-gas/blog/2019/12/17/strengthening-pipeline-data-management-in-arcgis"&gt;https://community.esri.com/community/electric-and-gas/blog/2019/12/17/strengthening-pipeline-data-management-in-arcgis&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; ) written by &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/9643"&gt;Tom DeWitte&lt;/A&gt;‌ that talks about this exact topic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/gas-and-pipeline-questions/which-to-use-arcgis-pipeline-referncing-ext-or/m-p/366098#M308</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertKrisher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-03T21:44:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

