<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Will all library versions be in final product? in File Geodatabase API Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309413#M498</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;32-bit/64-bit/VS2008/VS2010&lt;BR /&gt;Release, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MD)&lt;BR /&gt;Debug, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MDd)&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is Esri opposed to including the /MT and /MTd versions for some reason?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Some developers (like me) prefer to static link the C/C++ libraries.&amp;nbsp; Without those versions, all projects that use the File GeoDatabase API will be forced to use /MD or /MDd.&amp;nbsp; Please include the /MT and /MTd versions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Howard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HowardGleason</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-15T14:59:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309411#M496</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for including the 64-bit and debug libraries in beta 2, but will the final product include all variations of the C/C++ libraries?&amp;nbsp; Specifically, eight different libraries are needed to accommodate all possible ways users can build: Debug/Release, 32/64-bit, and Dynamic/Static C/C++ linking.&amp;nbsp; In terms of the VS compiler switches, for each of 32 and 64-bit: /MD, /MDd, /MT, /MTd.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Howard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309411#M496</guid>
      <dc:creator>HowardGleason</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T17:32:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309412#M497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Thanks for including the 64-bit and debug libraries in beta 2, but will the final product include all variations of the C/C++ libraries?&amp;nbsp; Specifically, eight different libraries are needed to accommodate all possible ways users can build: Debug/Release, 32/64-bit, and Dynamic/Static C/C++ linking.&amp;nbsp; In terms of the VS compiler switches, for each of 32 and 64-bit: /MD, /MDd, /MT, /MTd.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Howard&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is what we currently plan.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;32-bit/64-bit/VS2008/VS2010&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Release, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MD)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Debug, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MDd)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309412#M497</guid>
      <dc:creator>LanceShipman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T20:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309413#M498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;32-bit/64-bit/VS2008/VS2010&lt;BR /&gt;Release, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MD)&lt;BR /&gt;Debug, multi-threaded DLL runtime library (/MDd)&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is Esri opposed to including the /MT and /MTd versions for some reason?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Some developers (like me) prefer to static link the C/C++ libraries.&amp;nbsp; Without those versions, all projects that use the File GeoDatabase API will be forced to use /MD or /MDd.&amp;nbsp; Please include the /MT and /MTd versions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Howard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309413#M498</guid>
      <dc:creator>HowardGleason</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T14:59:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309414#M499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just because one of the resource libraries is linked /MD doesn't mean your application&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;needs to be /MD.&amp;nbsp; I just used VS 2008 to create an /MT application that uses the /MD &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;FileGDBAPI.lib -- It does create a FileGDBAPI.dll dependency, but the license permits &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;redistribution of the&amp;nbsp; DLL.&amp;nbsp; The plus here is that release of future SPs to the API wouldn't&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;always require recompilation of the apps that use it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:41:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309414#M499</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T14:41:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309415#M500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;-- It does create a FileGDBAPI.dll dependency&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And by extension, the FileGDBAPI.dll has a dependency on either MSVCR90.dll or MSVCR100.dll, which means I still have to account for the MS C/C++ libs in my install.&amp;nbsp; I always prefer to avoid dependencies and therefore avoid DLL issues.&amp;nbsp; (Though, I have to admit, these issues are much less severe than they used to be.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you have a policy against the /MT and /MTd versions of the .lib so be it, I just thought adding a couple of additional build configurations would be no big deal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309415#M500</guid>
      <dc:creator>HowardGleason</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T18:00:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Will all library versions be in final product?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309416#M501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm not on the Development side, but I think the issue would be the addition of eight more&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;configurations (Release + Debug x 32 + 64 x vs9 + vs10 x MD + MT).&amp;nbsp; Other Esri products&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;like ArcSDE also follow the DLL distribution model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/will-all-library-versions-be-in-final-product/m-p/309416#M501</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-16T21:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

