<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Problems with large datasets in File Geodatabase API Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102194#M187</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm testing huge datasets (millions of shapes) with different coverages for my country using API 1.1 with C++ and found some probably known problems :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- poor performance for large datasets due to not working spatial index&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- no support for compressed datasets&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The same data using ArcMap 10 loads very fast (~1 minute) and the spatial index for envelope selection is very quick. Also compression works too. Using API usually I give up after 10 min of waiting. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you going to fix and implement missing features in the next API release (1.2) and when do plan to release the update?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any tricks that I can you right now to speed up reading of tables (besides table-&amp;gt;LoadOnlyMode(true))?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Artur&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ArturRedzko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-19T19:50:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problems with large datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102194#M187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm testing huge datasets (millions of shapes) with different coverages for my country using API 1.1 with C++ and found some probably known problems :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- poor performance for large datasets due to not working spatial index&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- no support for compressed datasets&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The same data using ArcMap 10 loads very fast (~1 minute) and the spatial index for envelope selection is very quick. Also compression works too. Using API usually I give up after 10 min of waiting. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you going to fix and implement missing features in the next API release (1.2) and when do plan to release the update?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any tricks that I can you right now to speed up reading of tables (besides table-&amp;gt;LoadOnlyMode(true))?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Artur&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102194#M187</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArturRedzko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-19T19:50:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with large datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102195#M188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LoadOnlyMode(true) doesn't speed up query operations. It's purpose is to drop the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;spatial index to improve INSERT performance, but while in LoadOnlyMode, the feature&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;class query performance will be degraded (no index). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's possible that toggling load mode (from false to true and back to false) will improve&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;spatial query performance (depending on the fragmentation of the old index), but the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ordering of the spatial features inside the table itself (spatial fragmentation) might have&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a bigger impact on overall draw performance than a stale spatial index (and its impact&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;would be evenly applied to both access APIs).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"Draw" performance can also be impacted by unnecessary attribute retrieval (only&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;'get' the attribute(s) you need for rendering).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102195#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-20T11:08:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problems with large datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102196#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks. I hope that you will be able to release new update soon.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/file-geodatabase-api-questions/problems-with-large-datasets/m-p/102196#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArturRedzko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-24T13:07:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

