<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic merged features in TIN vs raster mosaic in Elevation Data Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/merged-features-in-tin-vs-raster-mosaic/m-p/859626#M168</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a five lines feature classes that I originally created individual TINS (Create TIN gp tool) for, from the TINS I created rasters (TIN to Raster gp tool). I then mosaicked all the grids into one master grid(Mosaic To New Raster gp tool) using the mosiac operator of maximum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for a way to be more efficient,&amp;nbsp; I merged (Merge gp tool)&amp;nbsp; the five line feature classes into one&amp;nbsp; line feature class, then converted the lines to a TIN (Create TIN gp tool) and the TIN into a grid (TIN to Raster gp tool). All feature classes are in a file geodatabase. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I do raster math subtracting one grid from the other, I am seeing massive differences (almost 50ft). I can understand some differences on the edges where the tinning is behaving differently than the mosaicing, however there are 10 foot differences between the line features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing the problems, and which data is correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kevin_Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-15T17:07:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>merged features in TIN vs raster mosaic</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/merged-features-in-tin-vs-raster-mosaic/m-p/859626#M168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a five lines feature classes that I originally created individual TINS (Create TIN gp tool) for, from the TINS I created rasters (TIN to Raster gp tool). I then mosaicked all the grids into one master grid(Mosaic To New Raster gp tool) using the mosiac operator of maximum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for a way to be more efficient,&amp;nbsp; I merged (Merge gp tool)&amp;nbsp; the five line feature classes into one&amp;nbsp; line feature class, then converted the lines to a TIN (Create TIN gp tool) and the TIN into a grid (TIN to Raster gp tool). All feature classes are in a file geodatabase. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I do raster math subtracting one grid from the other, I am seeing massive differences (almost 50ft). I can understand some differences on the edges where the tinning is behaving differently than the mosaicing, however there are 10 foot differences between the line features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing the problems, and which data is correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/merged-features-in-tin-vs-raster-mosaic/m-p/859626#M168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-15T17:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

