<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM in Elevation Data Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848081#M156</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 109 columns and 249 rows. I am using the NAD 1983 Zone 18 as my projected coordinate system, is there a projected coordinate system that is should use that is similar? Also, should I have this coordinate system from the start?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the jist of some GIS things but this has always tricked me. One of my former classmates made a similar map using bedrock topography elevation points, created contours and made a DEM from them. He then subtracted the Surface Elevation DEM from the Bedrock topography to get drift thickness and it turned out very smooth and at a cell size of 10 X and 10Y to match the surface DEM. That is ultimately what I am trying to do but the DEM is too coarse.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KarlBackhaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-29T00:26:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848079#M154</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently trying to create a DEM from ~1800 control points. Elevation ranges from 1820ft to 120ft. I created contours from a DEM generated by the contours. I have continuously had issues with the&amp;nbsp;output rasters being extremelty&amp;nbsp;pixelated. The pixeIs are generally 200m by 160meters using the NAD 1983 Zone 18N coordinate system. The default pixel size using the Topo to Raster Tool and Tin to Raster is&amp;nbsp;1.88159924474218E-03. Is there a step I am missing or anyway to resolve the issue?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 23:49:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848079#M154</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarlBackhaus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-28T23:49:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848080#M155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;sounds like your dem has decimal degree coordinates.&amp;nbsp; That cell size may be too coarse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many rows and columns do you have?&amp;nbsp; by default the extent is divided by 250 to yield the cell size, which would lead to coarse results in any case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a suggestion, it would be best to use a projected coordinate system.&amp;nbsp; In any event, this help topic is useful for making decisions on raster creation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/environment-settings/how-the-cell-size-projection-method-environment-setting-works.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/environment-settings/how-the-cell-size-projection-method-environment-setting-works.htm"&gt;How the Cell Size Projection Method environment setting works—Geoprocessing | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848080#M155</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T00:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848081#M156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 109 columns and 249 rows. I am using the NAD 1983 Zone 18 as my projected coordinate system, is there a projected coordinate system that is should use that is similar? Also, should I have this coordinate system from the start?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the jist of some GIS things but this has always tricked me. One of my former classmates made a similar map using bedrock topography elevation points, created contours and made a DEM from them. He then subtracted the Surface Elevation DEM from the Bedrock topography to get drift thickness and it turned out very smooth and at a cell size of 10 X and 10Y to match the surface DEM. That is ultimately what I am trying to do but the DEM is too coarse.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848081#M156</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarlBackhaus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T00:26:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848082#M157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the dem is coarse already, you have few options if you can't acquire or redo the dem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a look at&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-contouring-works.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-contouring-works.htm"&gt;How Contouring works—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;which provides a few tips on improving the 'quality' (in quotes) of the contours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848082#M157</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T00:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848083#M158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can go back to step 1 with the point data. They started in WGS_1984. I should reproject them to a UTM Coordinate system such as NAD 1983?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then convert the points to a raster by Kriging? Create the contours using the contour tool and set a small cell size? The DEM that I will be subtract from is 1m in resolution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848083#M158</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarlBackhaus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T01:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Contours to DEM creates pixelated DEM</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848084#M159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Project to UTM NAD83 would be a good start.&amp;nbsp; Follow that link about the projection cell size that I listed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interpolate …&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Hopefully your points are numerous and well distributed in space or you will have problems with any method of interpolation.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Select an appropriate cell size given the number of points and their distribution and spacing (art meets science to some degree)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Assuming that you have determined that Kriging, in some variant, is the most appropriate interpolator (that is a&amp;nbsp; much longer discussion),&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Contour, using a 'smoothing filter' for aesthetics.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;After all this, if you contours are all blocky and weird looking, take a hard look at the input data... it may not be enough, it may have a poor spatial distribution, the interpolator isn't appropriate for the data or myriad of other issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you just want a smooth look and aren't looking for anything else, have a gander at spline interpolation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/elevation-data-questions/contours-to-dem-creates-pixelated-dem/m-p/848084#M159</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-29T01:18:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

