<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Electric Utility Data Model in Electric Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728370#M666</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well to be truthful there should not be a lot of changes necessary to a base data model for Electric Distribution and or Transmission (I work in both). &amp;nbsp;However, I have personally found nearly every distribution data model to be overloaded with a lot of extra unnecessary items. Granted there are those who may make use of some of those attributes. &amp;nbsp;But when you have a basic data model that contains 75 different attributes for a Service Point you end up with a lot of clutter. &amp;nbsp;Most of my clients eventually want Windmil analysis so I have been using the NISC dm for them. &amp;nbsp;I also like their data model better than most others. &amp;nbsp;However, they have not updated their DM since 9.3. &amp;nbsp;But there has not been a lot of change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I ever get back to the EGUG conference I wanted to organized a data model session for the Electric Community. &amp;nbsp;Get a group of 10 people who have 15 plus years in Electric Distribution and hammer out a good solid all the junk removed data model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertBorchert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-22T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728367#M663</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a standard Electric Utility Data Model?&lt;BR /&gt;I've looked around and found a few, but they have been last updated in 2010. &amp;nbsp;Is there anything newer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728367#M663</guid>
      <dc:creator>TacomaPower</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-09T18:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728368#M664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using ArcFM for 16 years, model is still relevant today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Very detailed asset driven model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728368#M664</guid>
      <dc:creator>SSMIC3038</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-11T18:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728369#M665</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;...I've looked around and found a few...&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's thing about standards; there are plenty to choose from...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/wink.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728369#M665</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-11T19:17:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728370#M666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well to be truthful there should not be a lot of changes necessary to a base data model for Electric Distribution and or Transmission (I work in both). &amp;nbsp;However, I have personally found nearly every distribution data model to be overloaded with a lot of extra unnecessary items. Granted there are those who may make use of some of those attributes. &amp;nbsp;But when you have a basic data model that contains 75 different attributes for a Service Point you end up with a lot of clutter. &amp;nbsp;Most of my clients eventually want Windmil analysis so I have been using the NISC dm for them. &amp;nbsp;I also like their data model better than most others. &amp;nbsp;However, they have not updated their DM since 9.3. &amp;nbsp;But there has not been a lot of change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I ever get back to the EGUG conference I wanted to organized a data model session for the Electric Community. &amp;nbsp;Get a group of 10 people who have 15 plus years in Electric Distribution and hammer out a good solid all the junk removed data model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728370#M666</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertBorchert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-22T19:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728371#M667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Please keep me informed when you hammer out a new base line model. I work for a municipality very small electric company and am trying to set up the system with ARCGIS. I am a Lineman and our department is too small for a GIS position.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dale Weeks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="mailto:usarmy603@gmail.com"&gt;usarmy603@gmail.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 16:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728371#M667</guid>
      <dc:creator>dawjweeks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-25T16:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Electric Utility Data Model</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728372#M668</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually what can be more of a determining factor is what software you use to model you electric system. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of my clients use NISC for their model so I keep all of their GIS in the NISC datamodel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:58:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/electric-utility-data-model/m-p/728372#M668</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertBorchert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-18T16:58:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

