<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Optimised cartography maps in UNF in Electric Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588598#M497</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the editor maps, we used 18pt.&amp;nbsp; For mobile maps, we have made them larger in the past, around 22 would be good.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-24T03:12:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimised cartography maps in UNF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588595#M494</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the &lt;A href="https://solutions.arcgis.com/electric/help/electric-utility-network-foundation/use/benefits-of-the-electric-utility-network-foundation.htm"&gt;Benefits of the Electric Utility Network Foundation&lt;/A&gt; it talks about the included maps contain symbology optimised for use across the ArcGIS platform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anybody please elaborate on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to find out how the symbols were created and their associated parameters (eg. max size - 256 x 256px, 32bit colour, transparent background, no colour gradients, save as/export format - SVG, EMF, imported into stylx file as marker symbol, suitable applications to use - Inkscape, Adobe Illustrator, GIMP)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for anytime with this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 01:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588595#M494</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyRyanEQL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-19T01:41:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimised cartography maps in UNF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588596#M495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anthony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; The were built using SVG so they can be scaled larger or smaller without affecting quality.&amp;nbsp; They were also built with higher contrast to previous symbols so they are visible on top different basemaps available to ArcGIS users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588596#M495</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-22T16:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimised cartography maps in UNF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588597#M496</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was assuming this was the case. Thank you for the confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you suggest a starting point when it comes to the pixel size? I know SVG scale so it probably just depends on the fine detail I'm trying to achieve in the symbol which may/may not be able to be seen at the finished size on the layer symbology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588597#M496</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyRyanEQL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-22T21:55:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimised cartography maps in UNF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588598#M497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the editor maps, we used 18pt.&amp;nbsp; For mobile maps, we have made them larger in the past, around 22 would be good.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588598#M497</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-24T03:12:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimised cartography maps in UNF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588599#M498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for this additional information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 03:38:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/optimised-cartography-maps-in-unf/m-p/588599#M498</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyRyanEQL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-24T03:38:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

