<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple Utility Network Datasets in an Instance in Electric Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398621#M328</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now have one utility network dataset in a SQLExpress instance - this one has pipeline and structure domains.&amp;nbsp; Will it be OK if I create another utility network dataset in the same instance - the new one to have an electric and structure domains?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;These datasets will cover different geographies and have different spatial references.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I'm concerned about is the structure domains.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Will there be a naming conflict for the two sets of structure feature classes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any pointers would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;BR /&gt;Ed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-27T21:45:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple Utility Network Datasets in an Instance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398621#M328</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I now have one utility network dataset in a SQLExpress instance - this one has pipeline and structure domains.&amp;nbsp; Will it be OK if I create another utility network dataset in the same instance - the new one to have an electric and structure domains?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;These datasets will cover different geographies and have different spatial references.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I'm concerned about is the structure domains.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Will there be a naming conflict for the two sets of structure feature classes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any pointers would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;BR /&gt;Ed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398621#M328</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-27T21:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Utility Network Datasets in an Instance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398622#M329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The StructureNetwork for the 2nd UN will have _# suffixes added to ensure unique names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With that being said, there could be conflicts with coded value domains. Don't share asset type domains across multiple utility networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398622#M329</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulLeBlanc1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-27T21:54:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Utility Network Datasets in an Instance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398623#M330</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had the same concerns Ed, I have not had a chance to dig into it to form a good question, thanks for asking. So it sounds like, if you have for example, which is what I was thinking about, an Electric Structure and a Gas Structure it would be best to keep these separated of course, so you really need to plan this out to not cause issues down the road.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398623#M330</guid>
      <dc:creator>RichardDumont</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-02T16:07:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Utility Network Datasets in an Instance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398624#M331</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rich -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the note.&amp;nbsp; For my current purposes I just created a new SQLServer instance to hold my second (electric) dataset.&amp;nbsp; Seems to work fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:41:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/electric-questions/multiple-utility-network-datasets-in-an-instance/m-p/398624#M331</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-02T16:41:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

