<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 10.5 - Feature Class To Feature Class Field Mapping, Double Scale and Precision in Developers Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148367#M894</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;Hello.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;I have run into an issue with setting the scale and precision on a double field and it holding.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;I had built several models in 9.3 that would take a layer form a personal database and export to a shapefile, with specific field names and field sizes. Specifically several double fields that were set to 3 and 2 on scale and precision. In 9.3 they worked perfectly. Now in 10.5 when I set the same values for the double fields as I had in 9.3, the numbers returned are the same as they were in the personal database. Has anyone else had this issue? Any resolutions? For now I am running things through 9.3, but would like to resolve to hand off to other users using 10.5.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BarryLariviere</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-13T16:14:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>10.5 - Feature Class To Feature Class Field Mapping, Double Scale and Precision</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148367#M894</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;Hello.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;I have run into an issue with setting the scale and precision on a double field and it holding.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;I had built several models in 9.3 that would take a layer form a personal database and export to a shapefile, with specific field names and field sizes. Specifically several double fields that were set to 3 and 2 on scale and precision. In 9.3 they worked perfectly. Now in 10.5 when I set the same values for the double fields as I had in 9.3, the numbers returned are the same as they were in the personal database. Has anyone else had this issue? Any resolutions? For now I am running things through 9.3, but would like to resolve to hand off to other users using 10.5.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 8.5pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148367#M894</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarryLariviere</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-13T16:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 10.5 - Feature Class To Feature Class Field Mapping, Double Scale and Precision</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148368#M895</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A bug was noted in 10.4... &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/message/598656"&gt;check this thread... &lt;/A&gt;the bug number can be tracked to see if has been resolved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148368#M895</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-13T16:22:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 10.5 - Feature Class To Feature Class Field Mapping, Double Scale and Precision</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148369#M896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/10-5-feature-class-to-feature-class-field-mapping/m-p/148369#M896</guid>
      <dc:creator>BarryLariviere</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-13T17:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

