<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Poor performance join on database VS file geodatabase in Developers Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/poor-performance-join-on-database-vs-file/m-p/195435#M1189</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a feature class and a joined table by attribute.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently, we change the source of the joined table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the past, it was located in a geodatabase, now - in a file geodatabase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is a poor performance on Select by attribute by the field from the joined table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both joined fields are indexed. Searching field (&lt;SPAN&gt;Select by attribute)&lt;/SPAN&gt; is indexed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference is that in the past the&amp;nbsp;joined field in joined table was a primary key, now not (just indexed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What could be a reason for the poor performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkMindlin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-17T23:37:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor performance join on database VS file geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/poor-performance-join-on-database-vs-file/m-p/195435#M1189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a feature class and a joined table by attribute.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently, we change the source of the joined table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the past, it was located in a geodatabase, now - in a file geodatabase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is a poor performance on Select by attribute by the field from the joined table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both joined fields are indexed. Searching field (&lt;SPAN&gt;Select by attribute)&lt;/SPAN&gt; is indexed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only difference is that in the past the&amp;nbsp;joined field in joined table was a primary key, now not (just indexed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What could be a reason for the poor performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-questions/poor-performance-join-on-database-vs-file/m-p/195435#M1189</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkMindlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-17T23:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

