<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Geoprocessing - Allow the usage of an applications in-memory feature classes in Developers Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/geoprocessing-allow-the-usage-of-an-applications/idi-p/942506</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When creating applications using the Pro SDK, we are often executing a series of geoprocesses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be useful to have the option to save the output feature class of various geoproccessing&amp;nbsp;functions&amp;nbsp;(Buffers, Intersects, etc.) directly to defined objects in the application code, instead of writing the results to a geodatabase.&amp;nbsp; Then use these in-memory feature classes as inputs to other geoprocesses in the series.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buffer &lt;SPAN&gt;buffer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt; = new AnalysisTools.Buffer();&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Buffer&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;buffer2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;= new AnalysisTools.Buffer();&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IFeatureClass &lt;SPAN&gt;bufferedFc&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;= geoprocessor.Execute(buffer1, null);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IFeatureClass&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN&gt;bufferedFc2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;geoprocessor.Execute(buffer2, null);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Intersect intersect = new AnalysisTools.Intersect();&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;intersect.in_features = buffered1,&amp;nbsp;buffered2;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;intersect.out_feature_class = ... written to a geodatabase feature class&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object result = &lt;SPAN&gt;geoprocessor&lt;/SPAN&gt;.Execute(intersect, null);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would&amp;nbsp;increase&amp;nbsp;the applications&amp;nbsp;performance by eliminating the need to write the results of each geoprocess step&amp;nbsp;to a geodatabase, only to be read back into the application, and finally deleted at the end of the series.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DaveForsberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-12T18:01:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geoprocessing - Allow the usage of an applications in-memory feature classes</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/geoprocessing-allow-the-usage-of-an-applications/idi-p/942506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When creating applications using the Pro SDK, we are often executing a series of geoprocesses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be useful to have the option to save the output feature class of various geoproccessing&amp;nbsp;functions&amp;nbsp;(Buffers, Intersects, etc.) directly to defined objects in the application code, instead of writing the results to a geodatabase.&amp;nbsp; Then use these in-memory feature classes as inputs to other geoprocesses in the series.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Buffer &lt;SPAN&gt;buffer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt; = new AnalysisTools.Buffer();&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Buffer&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;buffer2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;= new AnalysisTools.Buffer();&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IFeatureClass &lt;SPAN&gt;bufferedFc&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;= geoprocessor.Execute(buffer1, null);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IFeatureClass&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN&gt;bufferedFc2&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;geoprocessor.Execute(buffer2, null);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Intersect intersect = new AnalysisTools.Intersect();&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;intersect.in_features = buffered1,&amp;nbsp;buffered2;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;intersect.out_feature_class = ... written to a geodatabase feature class&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object result = &lt;SPAN&gt;geoprocessor&lt;/SPAN&gt;.Execute(intersect, null);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would&amp;nbsp;increase&amp;nbsp;the applications&amp;nbsp;performance by eliminating the need to write the results of each geoprocess step&amp;nbsp;to a geodatabase, only to be read back into the application, and finally deleted at the end of the series.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:01:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/geoprocessing-allow-the-usage-of-an-applications/idi-p/942506</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaveForsberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-12T18:01:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

