<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk. in Developers Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idi-p/927954</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcObject, there are multiple interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) for on-the-fly topology processing but there is no equivalent in ArcGis Pro SDK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichelPothier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-14T16:24:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idi-p/927954</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcObject, there are multiple interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) for on-the-fly topology processing but there is no equivalent in ArcGis Pro SDK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idi-p/927954</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelPothier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-14T16:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927955#M206</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/groups/arcgis-pro-sdk?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=67cfc282-62cf-47b9-b83c-92f56a8c83e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0"&gt;https://community.esri.com/groups/arcgis-pro-sdk?sr=search&amp;amp;searchId=67cfc282-62cf-47b9-b83c-92f56a8c83e1&amp;amp;searchIndex=0&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927955#M206</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-15T22:57:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927956#M207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This functionality is necessary to perform shared edits (the equivalent of a map topology shared edit), but in an automated way behind the scenes for bulk updating for example. So if a polygon vertex is moved then corresponding lines and points that are spatially coincident are also moved.&amp;nbsp; There can be any number of spatially coincident feature classes that might need to be automatically moved.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be very beneficial to us to have this functionality in the ArcGIS Pro SDK.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 02:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927956#M207</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveTaylor1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T02:18:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927957#M208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jefferson County, Colorado makes heavy use of the ITopology* interfaces through a VS C#/.Net solution built using the ArcObjects SDK&amp;nbsp;that is&amp;nbsp;our &amp;nbsp;Address Street Political (ASP) Tools, an extension to ArcGIS Desktop.&amp;nbsp; Originally developed&amp;nbsp;for ArcGIS Desktop 9.3.1, it has been ported to what is currently 10.5.1 production.&amp;nbsp; In 2019, we're slated to make some data and tool enhancements to&amp;nbsp;the application including a port to 10.6.1- the final version for Desktop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 2020,&amp;nbsp;our plan is to re-write the functionality on the new ArcGIS Pro technology stack- but we require IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge and ITopologyNode exposed in the ArcPro SDK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Jefferson County, this need is mission critical. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 23:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927957#M208</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenMitchell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-02T23:41:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add equivalent classes to ArcObject interfaces (IMapTopology, ITopologyGraph, ITopologyEdge, ITopologyNode) in ArcGis Pro Sdk.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927958#M209</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for sharing your use case, Stephen. I'm glad to see the planning towards moving solutions into ArcGIS Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just a quick clarification that, while 10.6.1 is the &lt;EM&gt;current&lt;/EM&gt; version of Desktop, it won't be the &lt;EM&gt;final&lt;/EM&gt; version.&amp;nbsp; 10.7 will be released probably in March of 2019.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 14:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/developers-ideas/add-equivalent-classes-to-arcobject-interfaces/idc-p/927958#M209</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-05T14:44:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

