<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Migrating attachments to a related records table in Data Pipelines in Data Pipelines Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-pipelines-questions/migrating-attachments-to-a-related-records-table/m-p/1682240#M201</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to use &lt;STRONG&gt;ArcGIS Data Pipelines&lt;/STRONG&gt; to transform a dataset that currently has:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;polygon feature layer&lt;/STRONG&gt; with &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;into:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;polygon feature layer&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;related records table&lt;/STRONG&gt; (1:M)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;with the &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments stored on the related records&lt;/STRONG&gt;, not on the parent polygon.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far I’ve been able to migrate geometry and attributes into the new schema, and I can create the related records correctly. What I &lt;STRONG&gt;haven’t been able to do&lt;/STRONG&gt; is get &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments&lt;/STRONG&gt; to write to the related records table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed the configuration described in the &lt;A href="https://doc.arcgis.com/en/data-pipelines/latest/process/output-feature-layer.htm" target="_self"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(see Limitations), including:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Using &lt;STRONG&gt;Add and Update&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Setting a &lt;STRONG&gt;Unique ID&lt;/STRONG&gt; field for matching&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Ensuring attachments are enabled on the target table&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Ensuring the relationship class is correctly defined&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;…but attachments still do not appear on the related records in the output layer/table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is Data Pipelines currently able to write attachments directly to a &lt;STRONG&gt;related records table&lt;/STRONG&gt;, or am I configuring this incorrectly? If this workflow &lt;EM&gt;is&lt;/EM&gt; supported, what’s the correct pattern to target attachments for related records instead of the parent layer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance or examples would be appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 22:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CScriven</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-04T22:17:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Migrating attachments to a related records table in Data Pipelines</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-pipelines-questions/migrating-attachments-to-a-related-records-table/m-p/1682240#M201</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to use &lt;STRONG&gt;ArcGIS Data Pipelines&lt;/STRONG&gt; to transform a dataset that currently has:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;polygon feature layer&lt;/STRONG&gt; with &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;into:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;polygon feature layer&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;STRONG&gt;related records table&lt;/STRONG&gt; (1:M)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;with the &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments stored on the related records&lt;/STRONG&gt;, not on the parent polygon.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far I’ve been able to migrate geometry and attributes into the new schema, and I can create the related records correctly. What I &lt;STRONG&gt;haven’t been able to do&lt;/STRONG&gt; is get &lt;STRONG&gt;attachments&lt;/STRONG&gt; to write to the related records table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed the configuration described in the &lt;A href="https://doc.arcgis.com/en/data-pipelines/latest/process/output-feature-layer.htm" target="_self"&gt;documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(see Limitations), including:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Using &lt;STRONG&gt;Add and Update&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Setting a &lt;STRONG&gt;Unique ID&lt;/STRONG&gt; field for matching&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Ensuring attachments are enabled on the target table&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Ensuring the relationship class is correctly defined&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;…but attachments still do not appear on the related records in the output layer/table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is Data Pipelines currently able to write attachments directly to a &lt;STRONG&gt;related records table&lt;/STRONG&gt;, or am I configuring this incorrectly? If this workflow &lt;EM&gt;is&lt;/EM&gt; supported, what’s the correct pattern to target attachments for related records instead of the parent layer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance or examples would be appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 22:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-pipelines-questions/migrating-attachments-to-a-related-records-table/m-p/1682240#M201</guid>
      <dc:creator>CScriven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-04T22:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

