topic Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology, in Data Management Questions

Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:37:53 GMT

Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

I wanted to represent the fabric layer with no fill. This appears to show the boundaries of parcles that have been already merged\split. I return, if the fabric layer is represented with fill symbology, then these boundaries get hidden.

How can I still represent the fabric layer with no fill while having the merged\split hidden?

Thank you

Best

Jamal

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DanPatterson_Retired — Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:54:41 GMT

You still have an outline. Can't you set the outline to 0 or make the color the same as the fill

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:43:52 GMT

My question here is why the boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels disappear in case of “fill” and appears again in case of “no fill” option.

Be aware that this behavior is limited to the FABRIC LAYERS, I guess!

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DanPatterson_Retired — Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:21:37 GMT

because the boundaries are still there when fill is on...you just can't see them unless they are in a substantially different color

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DEAF_PROBERT_68 — Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:08:10 GMT

To me it look like there could be 3 parcels 62,62/2,62/2/2 are all in one parcel if that is what you meant ?

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:57:08 GMT

Thanks Robert. This is precisely what I mean.

I still need to have the symbology for the parcels “without fill” but having the indicated boundary below in the screenshot hidden.

What is interesting is that the indicated boundary below can be AUTOMATICALLY hidden if the symbology for the parcels is chosen to be “with fill”!

What might this indicate for?

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DanPatterson_Retired — Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:03:46 GMT

is one feature stacked over the other? select the appropriate record in the table rather than onscreen and set your polygon outlines to 0

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:19:18 GMT

Hi Dan,

I think that the behavior with the fabric feature class is different from the standard feature class. You may need to try it in an actual fabric environment.

Please, find attached my fabric feature class

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DanPatterson_Retired — Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:24:29 GMT

Have you contacted the Fabric group? you seem to be the only one ... other than the occasional esri member.... that uses them. The question remains as to whether the geometry is stacked as in a union or whether a symmetrical difference is produced. If it is to maintain historic lineage, then I wouldn't be surprised at all that the boundaries are retained and 'visually' they appear incorrect, however, in terms of attributes or temporal lineage they are.

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:37:39 GMT

Thanks Dan,

I’m not sure if your time has allowed you to explore the ready fabric feature class I have already provided. Trying to apply symbology will not yield results as working with regular feature classes

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

DanPatterson_Retired — Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:50:14 GMT

You may have to come up with a new subcategory like

Boundary (like now)

Div Boundary (which is subdivided boundary)

In essence it is all there, it is a matter of getting the data categorized in a fashion that allows you to subdivide your lines for the boundaries into 2 classes (original and new)

Re: Boundaries of merged\split fabric parcels still appear when choosing “no fill” symbology,

JamalNUMAN — Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:55:25 GMT

Thanks Dan,

Best

Jamal