<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Tied addresses using a composite locator in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125247#M7200</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am geocoding roughly one hundred thousand addresses that represent law, fire, and ems incidents of several years. (These addresses are boiled down to a single occurance; I've got about 750,000 associated incidents to these addresses...) I have a stack of locators in a composite that I trying to fine tune to get a balance of hits at 100%, hits with LT 100%, Ties and Missed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The order of the composite locator is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Addresspoints_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Addresspoints_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Streets_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Streets_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both address point layers have a minimum match score of 100.&amp;nbsp; Each of the streets has a minimum match of 75.&amp;nbsp; However, I'm a little confused when I get a tie.&amp;nbsp; For example, I'm looking at a tied address that gives the Locator Name of Addresspoints_2.&amp;nbsp; Hmmm, I say to myself; does that mean I have two points with the same address?&amp;nbsp; If I create a relate between the geocoding results and the Addresspoints_2 feature class, I only show one point in the Addresspoints_2 feature class.&amp;nbsp; That tells me the tie is between locators; if I scroll through the locator pick list I find that it's matched TWICE to the Addresspoints_2 locator and once to the Streets_1 locator. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the part of being tied between the points and the streets, but why twice on points?&amp;nbsp; (Version 10.0, all a feature classes are in a FGDB, all locators are stand alone, as in not an object of any geodatabase.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116442_pastedImage_0.png"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image" height="175" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116442_pastedImage_0.png" style="max-width:888px; max-;" width="888" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116443_pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-2 jive-image" height="144" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116443_pastedImage_1.png" style="max-width:716px; max-;" width="716" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-10T17:35:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Tied addresses using a composite locator</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125247#M7200</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am geocoding roughly one hundred thousand addresses that represent law, fire, and ems incidents of several years. (These addresses are boiled down to a single occurance; I've got about 750,000 associated incidents to these addresses...) I have a stack of locators in a composite that I trying to fine tune to get a balance of hits at 100%, hits with LT 100%, Ties and Missed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The order of the composite locator is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Addresspoints_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Addresspoints_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Streets_1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Streets_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both address point layers have a minimum match score of 100.&amp;nbsp; Each of the streets has a minimum match of 75.&amp;nbsp; However, I'm a little confused when I get a tie.&amp;nbsp; For example, I'm looking at a tied address that gives the Locator Name of Addresspoints_2.&amp;nbsp; Hmmm, I say to myself; does that mean I have two points with the same address?&amp;nbsp; If I create a relate between the geocoding results and the Addresspoints_2 feature class, I only show one point in the Addresspoints_2 feature class.&amp;nbsp; That tells me the tie is between locators; if I scroll through the locator pick list I find that it's matched TWICE to the Addresspoints_2 locator and once to the Streets_1 locator. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the part of being tied between the points and the streets, but why twice on points?&amp;nbsp; (Version 10.0, all a feature classes are in a FGDB, all locators are stand alone, as in not an object of any geodatabase.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116442_pastedImage_0.png"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image" height="175" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116442_pastedImage_0.png" style="max-width:888px; max-;" width="888" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116443_pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-2 jive-image" height="144" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/116443_pastedImage_1.png" style="max-width:716px; max-;" width="716" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125247#M7200</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-10T17:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tied addresses using a composite locator</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125248#M7201</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;George,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this still an issue with a more current version of ArcMap like 10.3 or higher?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125248#M7201</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShanaBritt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-02T16:54:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tied addresses using a composite locator</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125249#M7202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shana- &amp;nbsp;that was two years ago. &amp;nbsp;I can't even remember what the problem was,&amp;nbsp;but I bet I got it fixed!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW- how are the 10.5 locators doing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe B.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125249#M7202</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-02T18:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tied addresses using a composite locator</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125250#M7203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven’t heard too much yet and what I have heard was about the output fields and wanting to know what they mean.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Shana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/tied-addresses-using-a-composite-locator/m-p/125250#M7203</guid>
      <dc:creator>ShanaBritt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-03T14:45:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

