<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117194#M6684</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;I imagine because calculating standard deviation on a bunch of integers still requires a floating point number for maximum precision. For example the standard deviation of [1,2,2,2] is 0.5.&amp;nbsp; You could always run the integer (INT) tool on the output standard deviation raster to convert back.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good point, Chris. I guess it depends on how much precision I need. I will need to look at some neighboring values and see if it would work with less precision. I am glad you pointed out the INT tool. Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Todd&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ToddKesselring1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-23T16:40:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117192#M6682</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I used the Focal Statistics tool in the Neighborhood toolbox out of the Spatial Analyst tools and created a STD image from a 16 bit, unsigned integer TIFF image. The result was a 32 bit floating point image TIFF. My question is why did it change the pixel type and pixel depth? Is there a way to control this in the output or is the increased pixel depth actually desirable?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117192#M6682</guid>
      <dc:creator>ToddKesselring1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-23T12:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117193#M6683</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I imagine because calculating standard deviation on a bunch of integers still requires a floating point number for maximum precision. For example the standard deviation of [1,2,2,2] is 0.5.&amp;nbsp; You could always run the integer (INT) tool on the output standard deviation raster to convert back.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Chris&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117193#M6683</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisBater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-23T13:40:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117194#M6684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;I imagine because calculating standard deviation on a bunch of integers still requires a floating point number for maximum precision. For example the standard deviation of [1,2,2,2] is 0.5.&amp;nbsp; You could always run the integer (INT) tool on the output standard deviation raster to convert back.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good point, Chris. I guess it depends on how much precision I need. I will need to look at some neighboring values and see if it would work with less precision. I am glad you pointed out the INT tool. Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Todd&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117194#M6684</guid>
      <dc:creator>ToddKesselring1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-23T16:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117195#M6685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is not a matter of precision in the way your are thinking. The values after the decimal are important and just truncating them can bias how a given statistical moment represents the distribution function. As such, be careful truncating floating point values using Int. If you want a 16-bit image you could do something like. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Int(FocalStatistics(raster,NbrRectangle(3,3,MAP), "STD")*1000)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117195#M6685</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffreyEvans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-23T19:34:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard deviation image created from 16 bit raster image is a 32 bit image</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117196#M6686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jeffrey,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the input. Yes, even though the size seems excessive the extra information may prove useful. I am using the standard deviation with the original brightness as a 2 band stacked image for supervised classification. The values past the decimal may be decisive in assigning pixels to classes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Todd&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/standard-deviation-image-created-from-16-bit/m-p/117196#M6686</guid>
      <dc:creator>ToddKesselring1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-01T13:32:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

