<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No data values showing up in a supervised classification in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103670#M6030</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok, I got one of the two categories to show up by splitting the category, adding some extra training samples and then running the classification again.&amp;nbsp; But this same technique did not work for the other no data category.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>grahamlangley-edwards</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-01T19:40:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No data values showing up in a supervised classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103667#M6027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, I have been doing supervised classifications for several Landsat images.&amp;nbsp; For the last image I classified as usual, but when I ran the classification two of the categories came up as no data.&amp;nbsp; I have included a screen shot of a the classification with no data.&amp;nbsp; I have no idea what went wrong with this classification as I followed the same work flow for all of the previous classifications, which ran fine.&amp;nbsp; I am using ArcGIS 10, and Windows 7 Professional.&amp;nbsp; If anyone has any ideas I would really appreciate the help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Graham&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103667#M6027</guid>
      <dc:creator>grahamlangley-edwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-31T17:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No data values showing up in a supervised classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103668#M6028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What could be happening is that the pixels that are appearing as nodata are being rejected by the reject fraction in the classification tool.&amp;nbsp; Per &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//009z000000pp000000.htm"&gt;the help&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, reject fraction controls the "portion of cells that will remain unclassified due to the lowest possibility of correct assignments."&amp;nbsp; I would consider whether the training samples you are using would be applicable to those areas and then consider performing the classification again.&amp;nbsp; If you are applying a signature generated from another set of files, the pixel values could be different.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103668#M6028</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffreySwain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-01T10:27:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No data values showing up in a supervised classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103669#M6029</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Jeff, thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I'm not using a signature from another file, just performing a normal Interactive Classification for each image. I don't have that much experience with ArcGIS, but I understood that the reject fraction was involved only when performing a Maximum Likelihood Classification.&amp;nbsp; Is it also involved when running the Interactive Supervised Classification?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If it is, I don't see why it would have happened just for this layer.&amp;nbsp; Anyway, redoing the classification would take a very long time, is there no other way to rectify this problem?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Graham&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103669#M6029</guid>
      <dc:creator>grahamlangley-edwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-01T19:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No data values showing up in a supervised classification</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103670#M6030</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok, I got one of the two categories to show up by splitting the category, adding some extra training samples and then running the classification again.&amp;nbsp; But this same technique did not work for the other no data category.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/no-data-values-showing-up-in-a-supervised/m-p/103670#M6030</guid>
      <dc:creator>grahamlangley-edwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-01T19:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

