<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Solaris ZFS and SAMBA performance in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/solaris-zfs-and-samba-performance/m-p/94277#M5534</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have significance performance issues when I access and perform processing on file geodatabases stored on a Solaris ZFS filesystems accessed through SAMBA, compared to a Windows server. Has anyone else experienced this problem?&amp;nbsp; It currently about 8 times slower.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 01:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DaleRichter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-06T01:46:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Solaris ZFS and SAMBA performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/solaris-zfs-and-samba-performance/m-p/94277#M5534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have significance performance issues when I access and perform processing on file geodatabases stored on a Solaris ZFS filesystems accessed through SAMBA, compared to a Windows server. Has anyone else experienced this problem?&amp;nbsp; It currently about 8 times slower.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 01:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/solaris-zfs-and-samba-performance/m-p/94277#M5534</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaleRichter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T01:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

