<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Map scale 1: 50 000 and conversion to raster 2.5m in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90142#M5256</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;If you were talking about a printed map I would think about it this way...&lt;BR /&gt;On a very finely drawn map, a line would appear to be about 0.2mm width, this equates to a pixel size of 10m (0.2 X 50,000 / 1,000). Then there are all the other things to consider, generalization and detail at that scale.&lt;BR /&gt;But if that's what you've got, go with it. Just be aware of the potential pitfalls.&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck, Neil&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Neil so much for your guidance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Lien&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 02:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LienPham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-14T02:12:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Map scale 1: 50 000 and conversion to raster 2.5m</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90140#M5254</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a soil map with scale 1:50 000 and a SPOT5 image resolution 2.5m. I would like to convert that vector soil layer to raster format with the resolution 2.5m because I would like to use 2 kinds of data for landscape classification. I wonder that whether the conversion of soil layer to 2.5m is appropriate? If not appropriate, which resolution of raster should be when converted from&amp;nbsp; the map scale 1:50 000?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank for your consideration.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pham&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 23:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90140#M5254</guid>
      <dc:creator>LienPham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-12T23:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Map scale 1: 50 000 and conversion to raster 2.5m</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90141#M5255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you were talking about a printed map I would think about it this way...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;On a very finely drawn map, a line would appear to be about 0.2mm width, this equates to a pixel size of 10m (0.2 X 50,000 / 1,000). Then there are all the other things to consider, generalization and detail at that scale.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But if that's what you've got, go with it. Just be aware of the potential pitfalls.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good luck, Neil&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 06:10:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90141#M5255</guid>
      <dc:creator>NeilAyres</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-13T06:10:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Map scale 1: 50 000 and conversion to raster 2.5m</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90142#M5256</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;If you were talking about a printed map I would think about it this way...&lt;BR /&gt;On a very finely drawn map, a line would appear to be about 0.2mm width, this equates to a pixel size of 10m (0.2 X 50,000 / 1,000). Then there are all the other things to consider, generalization and detail at that scale.&lt;BR /&gt;But if that's what you've got, go with it. Just be aware of the potential pitfalls.&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck, Neil&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Neil so much for your guidance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Lien&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 02:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/map-scale-1-50-000-and-conversion-to-raster-2-5m/m-p/90142#M5256</guid>
      <dc:creator>LienPham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T02:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

