<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: zLAS to Multipoint? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/zlas-to-multipoint/m-p/9494#M507</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;When working with many LAS tiles, the process from LAS to Multipoint is time consuming.&amp;nbsp; I have attempted the zLAS format, but I receive a "000725" error at "Output Feature Class" with no explanation about wrong file format elsewhere.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to convert zLAS to Multipoint with the LAS to Multipoint tool?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;John,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Generally, the performance looks fine, when used to classify LAS data, which should be based on 'individual' LAS return (rather than bulk of returns) �?�&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;On optimal use of the GP tool �??LAS to Multipoints�?? via compressed LAS, the following can be raised for consideration:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Firstly, zLAS is from ESRI. zLAS is different from mainstream �??open�?? LAS standard �??LASz, which is widely supported by many solution vendors. In fact, there are also many discussions/rumors on ESRI zLAS. Pls refer to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://rapidlasso.com/2013/12/30/new-compressed-las-format-by-esri/"&gt;http://rapidlasso.com/2013/12/30/new-compressed-las-format-by-esri/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Secondly, it looks that 10.2 does not support its own zLAS very deeply,&amp;nbsp; �?� Not sure why not? ESRI should support �??open�?? LASz first as first priority, honestly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 05:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>larryzhang1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-25T05:24:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>zLAS to Multipoint?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/zlas-to-multipoint/m-p/9493#M506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When working with many LAS tiles, the process from LAS to Multipoint is time consuming.&amp;nbsp; I have attempted the zLAS format, but I receive a "000725" error at "Output Feature Class" with no explanation about wrong file format elsewhere.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it possible to convert zLAS to Multipoint with the LAS to Multipoint tool?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 18:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/zlas-to-multipoint/m-p/9493#M506</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnHenrichsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-01T18:39:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: zLAS to Multipoint?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/zlas-to-multipoint/m-p/9494#M507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;When working with many LAS tiles, the process from LAS to Multipoint is time consuming.&amp;nbsp; I have attempted the zLAS format, but I receive a "000725" error at "Output Feature Class" with no explanation about wrong file format elsewhere.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to convert zLAS to Multipoint with the LAS to Multipoint tool?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;John,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Generally, the performance looks fine, when used to classify LAS data, which should be based on 'individual' LAS return (rather than bulk of returns) �?�&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;On optimal use of the GP tool �??LAS to Multipoints�?? via compressed LAS, the following can be raised for consideration:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Firstly, zLAS is from ESRI. zLAS is different from mainstream �??open�?? LAS standard �??LASz, which is widely supported by many solution vendors. In fact, there are also many discussions/rumors on ESRI zLAS. Pls refer to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://rapidlasso.com/2013/12/30/new-compressed-las-format-by-esri/"&gt;http://rapidlasso.com/2013/12/30/new-compressed-las-format-by-esri/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Secondly, it looks that 10.2 does not support its own zLAS very deeply,&amp;nbsp; �?� Not sure why not? ESRI should support �??open�?? LASz first as first priority, honestly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 05:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/zlas-to-multipoint/m-p/9494#M507</guid>
      <dc:creator>larryzhang1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-25T05:24:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

