<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic To SID or not to SID?...that is the question in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/to-sid-or-not-to-sid-that-is-the-question/m-p/80989#M4684</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well, what do you all think. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are some situations when you would convert your rasters into an image compression format like .sid?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there reasons why you would not do this? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are the advantages and disadvantages of using an image compression format within the 10.1 environment?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have used Raster Catalogs, and imported my Rasters into a File Geodatabase. Used each of these in ArcGIS Desktop 10.1, seems .sid loads faster and refreshes faster during zoom in/out compared to using Geodatabase Rasters. Hence, I am wondering why not just use .sid all the time?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimHayes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-05T14:14:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>To SID or not to SID?...that is the question</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/to-sid-or-not-to-sid-that-is-the-question/m-p/80989#M4684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well, what do you all think. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are some situations when you would convert your rasters into an image compression format like .sid?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there reasons why you would not do this? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are the advantages and disadvantages of using an image compression format within the 10.1 environment?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have used Raster Catalogs, and imported my Rasters into a File Geodatabase. Used each of these in ArcGIS Desktop 10.1, seems .sid loads faster and refreshes faster during zoom in/out compared to using Geodatabase Rasters. Hence, I am wondering why not just use .sid all the time?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/to-sid-or-not-to-sid-that-is-the-question/m-p/80989#M4684</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimHayes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-05T14:14:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

