<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unregister a Feature Class in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142854#M43833</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Short answer - the client wants to keep the data on the GDB in case any end users are still using it (there's a lot of old items out there).&amp;nbsp; Part of the unregistration attempt is also to remove confusion when a user attempts to load something in ArcGIS Portal.&amp;nbsp; We want them to load the newer items, but we have "very special" end users, so anything to avoid confusion. I'd guess that the "benefit" is not getting a bunch of trouble tickets from users who don't use the system much and will easily confuse table_a with table_a_st and load the former and have it fail.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-10T21:00:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142842#M43831</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;(Using ArcGIS 10.8.1 and Oracle 19c)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to unregister some older feature class tables (legacy ESRI Binary geometry) from our geodatabase, since they all have newer ST_GEOMETRY counterparts (either as standalone or as part of a view), as a means of avoiding confusion with the end users as to which is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I'm basically trying to do is to get the (legacy) table to be viewed by Catalog as a table and no longer as a feature class.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I've researched, post-SDE, I don't think there's a straight way to unregister something (these are unversioned), so what I was going to try and do, is run a delete on the sde owned tables and possibly also null out the shape column:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delete&lt;BR /&gt;from SDE.table_registry&lt;BR /&gt;where owner = 'myschema'&lt;BR /&gt;and table_name = 'myfeature';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delete&lt;BR /&gt;from sde.column_registry&lt;BR /&gt;where owner = 'myschema'&lt;BR /&gt;and table_name = 'myfeature';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delete&lt;BR /&gt;from sde.layers&lt;BR /&gt;where owner = 'myschema'&lt;BR /&gt;and table_name = 'myfeature';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delete&lt;BR /&gt;FROM sde.geometry_columns&lt;BR /&gt;WHERE f_table_schema = 'myschema'&lt;BR /&gt;AND f_table_name = 'myfeature';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UPDATE myschema.myfeature&lt;BR /&gt;SET SHAPE = NULL;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried it on a test case and it still somehow shows up as a (blank) FC in Catalog, so I'm guessing that there's some place else that still recognizes it as registered.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there anything else that I would need to do in addition, or instead of this route?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142842#M43831</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-10T20:22:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142848#M43832</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure that there is a safe (or supported) way to unregister a feature class from the geodatabase outside of deleting the "old" FC. There are lots of other tables where dependencies may live.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you created an unregistered spatial table, it will show up as a "feature class" in Catalog, but not be able to participate in the advanced geodatabase functionality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the background above, what is the "benefit" for you to unregister?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why not export it to a file geodatabase / change the name to something different so it does not get used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to understand the "why" you want to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look forward to hearing from you soon!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142848#M43832</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-10T20:37:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142854#M43833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Short answer - the client wants to keep the data on the GDB in case any end users are still using it (there's a lot of old items out there).&amp;nbsp; Part of the unregistration attempt is also to remove confusion when a user attempts to load something in ArcGIS Portal.&amp;nbsp; We want them to load the newer items, but we have "very special" end users, so anything to avoid confusion. I'd guess that the "benefit" is not getting a bunch of trouble tickets from users who don't use the system much and will easily confuse table_a with table_a_st and load the former and have it fail.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142854#M43833</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-10T21:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142860#M43834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, thanks for the additional information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it were me, I would just rename the table to something that would not cause confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if the table was "unregistered" it would still show up in the ArcGIS client.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142860#M43834</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-10T21:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142870#M43835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The rename may be on the table as a final option (they don't like to rename or delete anything if possible), but the desire from them is to "unregister" them in such a way that they keep the name and current data, but appear as an SDE Table instead of an SDE Feature Class.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'd think there would be some way to unregister, lol. I'm likely going to have to run a trace and see what all else is touched when I do a delete on an FC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142870#M43835</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-10T21:44:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142921#M43837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no effective unregister, just geodatabase corruption.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd create a new table with "CREATE TABLE newname AS SELECT * FROM oldname" then use ArcPy to Delete_management() the 'oldname' feature class but I'm only ever using native geometry types. SDEBINARY are not effectively recoverable from *either* the DELETE FROM sde.* hack or from CREATE TABLE AS, so the best solution is to FeatureClassToGeodatabase into a file geodatabase, then right-click delete in the database.&amp;nbsp; You can reload into the old name after that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 01:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1142921#M43837</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-11T01:02:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143038#M43840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That may work.&amp;nbsp; Would I necessarily have to recreate the table from scratch or would a TableToTable function (Import Table to Geodatabase) work just as well?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143038#M43840</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-11T14:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143143#M43841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;TableToTable/TableToGeodatabase doesn't support geometries. It would need to be FC2FC/FC2G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143143#M43841</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-11T17:19:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143152#M43842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;But if the shapes were no longer needed on it, and they were nulled out once exported via calculation, then wouldn't you just essentially have a table?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1143152#M43842</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartPittari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-11T17:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unregister a Feature Class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1144993#M43849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If a field of type geometry exists in the column list, even if it's always NULL, then TableToTable is not the right tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/unregister-a-feature-class/m-p/1144993#M43849</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-17T00:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

