<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Raster to point feature class in geodatabase in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748303#M42088</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Same problem here. Rather inconvenient that ArcGIS makes an intermediate shapefile first, so the 2GB limit is basically in effect even for a file geodatabase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GarthHoeppner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-31T15:44:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Raster to point feature class in geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748301#M42086</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a very large raster (46000 x 29000 cells). What I would like to do is to convert the raster to some kind of point feature class. I can't convert it to a point shapefile because of the 2Gb size limit, so is there any way to convert a raster to a point feature class inside a geodatabase? I tried to use the Raster to Point tool to create a point dataset inside a geodatabase but it didn't work�??apparently Raster to Point assumes the output is a shapefile and gives you the 2Gb limit error, even if you try to save it inside a geodatabase and don't use the .shp extension. Is there any way to do this successfully?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748301#M42086</guid>
      <dc:creator>NathanOdgers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T14:16:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raster to point feature class in geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748302#M42087</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You really don't want a 1.3 billion point table anywhere -- Even with the best possible&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;performance, you're looking at a 30+ hour load time (and hours to do any meaningful&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;analysis).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If your points don't vary in value all that much, you might be able to map 1Kx1K pixel &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;chunks into a multi-point table (where all the points with the same value are merged into &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a single feature) -- this will still be moderately unusable as tens of thousands of features&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;with tens of thousands of verticies.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your best bet is to apply some classification scheme and convert the result into a polygon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;table.&amp;nbsp; Still unwieldy due to the vertex count, but better than the other options. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748302#M42087</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T14:59:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raster to point feature class in geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748303#M42088</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Same problem here. Rather inconvenient that ArcGIS makes an intermediate shapefile first, so the 2GB limit is basically in effect even for a file geodatabase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748303#M42088</guid>
      <dc:creator>GarthHoeppner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-31T15:44:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Raster to point feature class in geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748304#M42089</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Vector tables are easy to append to -- why not break your raster into managable pieces,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;extract the multipoints for each part, and merge into a final product?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 15:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/raster-to-point-feature-class-in-geodatabase/m-p/748304#M42089</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-01T15:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

