<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Methods for creating composite locators from very large single locators. USA State roads to USA Coverage? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/methods-for-creating-composite-locators-from-very/m-p/745939#M41982</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created 5 datasets from the tiger all_lines of only roads with the attributes to create the Dual Address locator.&amp;nbsp; each feature has around 11millions records.&amp;nbsp; I added states to feature files in alphabetical order.&amp;nbsp; I will be creating a locator from each one then using a composite locater for the whole coverage.&amp;nbsp; Would the lookups be more efficient if the files were in geographic proximity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;techhowgirl@gmail.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharlineAvey1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-04T14:47:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Methods for creating composite locators from very large single locators. USA State roads to USA Coverage?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/methods-for-creating-composite-locators-from-very/m-p/745939#M41982</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created 5 datasets from the tiger all_lines of only roads with the attributes to create the Dual Address locator.&amp;nbsp; each feature has around 11millions records.&amp;nbsp; I added states to feature files in alphabetical order.&amp;nbsp; I will be creating a locator from each one then using a composite locater for the whole coverage.&amp;nbsp; Would the lookups be more efficient if the files were in geographic proximity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;techhowgirl@gmail.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/methods-for-creating-composite-locators-from-very/m-p/745939#M41982</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlineAvey1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T14:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

