<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Limit features that can be added to a dataset through the spatial extent? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/limit-features-that-can-be-added-to-a-dataset/m-p/739652#M41737</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to find a practical way to limit the spatial extent of features that individual editors can modify in a replicated database architecture. We currently have a central database that is being edited by people in field offices - ideally those editors would only be able to edit features within their geographic area(s) of responsibility. We can create parent/child replicas and use permissions to limit data access, but the well-meaning, more adventurous editors could still load data outside their area (which they do need to be able to see), edit it in their version, and then post erroneous changes.&amp;nbsp; We've had issues with inexperienced users processing widespread, unintended changes that had to be reversed. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'd also like to be able to have the users only have to pull the data they really need to increase load speed. I think that this would also allow us to more easily pinpoint where we have data quality challenges (though the feature-level editing tracking should help there).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ideas welcome....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Laura&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 23:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LauraSilsbee1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-03T23:33:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Limit features that can be added to a dataset through the spatial extent?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/limit-features-that-can-be-added-to-a-dataset/m-p/739652#M41737</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to find a practical way to limit the spatial extent of features that individual editors can modify in a replicated database architecture. We currently have a central database that is being edited by people in field offices - ideally those editors would only be able to edit features within their geographic area(s) of responsibility. We can create parent/child replicas and use permissions to limit data access, but the well-meaning, more adventurous editors could still load data outside their area (which they do need to be able to see), edit it in their version, and then post erroneous changes.&amp;nbsp; We've had issues with inexperienced users processing widespread, unintended changes that had to be reversed. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'd also like to be able to have the users only have to pull the data they really need to increase load speed. I think that this would also allow us to more easily pinpoint where we have data quality challenges (though the feature-level editing tracking should help there).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ideas welcome....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Laura&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 23:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/limit-features-that-can-be-added-to-a-dataset/m-p/739652#M41737</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraSilsbee1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-03T23:33:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

