<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Reconcile Issue in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685514#M38866</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This turned out to be an issue involving our feature linked annotation that was resolved with SP2.&amp;nbsp; The versions were actually reconciling, they just took a long time.&amp;nbsp; We no longer have this problem&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DouglasGenzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-16T15:06:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reconcile Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685513#M38865</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are no longer able to reconcile our parcel fabric versioned geodatabase using the �??detect conflicts by object�?� method.&amp;nbsp; When we try to reconcile we get this error.&amp;nbsp; �?? Version could not be reconciled.&amp;nbsp; The field is not nullable [SHAPE.LEN].�?�&amp;nbsp; We have tried to reconcile different versions and get the same message for all of them.&amp;nbsp; We use ArcGIS Workflow Manager, but cannot reconcile using the �??by object�?� method outside of Workflow Manager (ArcMap) either.&amp;nbsp; We have many outstanding versions (edits). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style:italic;"&gt;We can reconcile using the �??by attribute�?� method&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;, but want to know if there are feature conflicts before posting to defalt and favoring the edit version.&amp;nbsp; Thanks people!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:51:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685513#M38865</guid>
      <dc:creator>DouglasGenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-13T14:51:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reconcile Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685514#M38866</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This turned out to be an issue involving our feature linked annotation that was resolved with SP2.&amp;nbsp; The versions were actually reconciling, they just took a long time.&amp;nbsp; We no longer have this problem&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685514#M38866</guid>
      <dc:creator>DouglasGenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T15:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reconcile Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685515#M38867</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can you give any more details on what the problem was and how you got rid of it. We also are using the Parcel Fabric and have feature-linked anno in the same Geodatabase. We are at using 10 SP2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-Thanks, Al Benvin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/reconcile-issue/m-p/685515#M38867</guid>
      <dc:creator>AllanBenvin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-09T13:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

