<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: many-to-many relationship class in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/many-to-many-relationship-class/m-p/677509#M38388</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Think of it as independent and dependant variables...&amp;nbsp; If you were to graph the data what would be the x and what would be the y.&amp;nbsp; That may not be straightforward in a lot of cases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here's a quick example, European Countries may have membership in many internation organizations (EU, Nato, etc.) and Organizations have many European Countries as members.&amp;nbsp; In this case I would use Countries as Origin since a County can exist independently from the organization, whereas the organization is dependent upon a county belonging to it.&amp;nbsp; Hope that helps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MilesWacker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-18T19:52:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>many-to-many relationship class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/many-to-many-relationship-class/m-p/677508#M38387</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is a fundamental criteria to decide who is the origin Feature Class/Table and who is the destination Feature Class/Table, in a many-to-many relationship class?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don´t understand clearly this situation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Virginia&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:27:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/many-to-many-relationship-class/m-p/677508#M38387</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pía_ZenaidaVirginia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-18T15:27:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: many-to-many relationship class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/many-to-many-relationship-class/m-p/677509#M38388</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Think of it as independent and dependant variables...&amp;nbsp; If you were to graph the data what would be the x and what would be the y.&amp;nbsp; That may not be straightforward in a lot of cases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here's a quick example, European Countries may have membership in many internation organizations (EU, Nato, etc.) and Organizations have many European Countries as members.&amp;nbsp; In this case I would use Countries as Origin since a County can exist independently from the organization, whereas the organization is dependent upon a county belonging to it.&amp;nbsp; Hope that helps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/many-to-many-relationship-class/m-p/677509#M38388</guid>
      <dc:creator>MilesWacker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-18T19:52:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

