<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mosaic Dataset : Build Seamlines : Computional Method in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaic-dataset-build-seamlines-computional-method/m-p/644776#M36470</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When building Seamlines for a Mosaic Dataset, there are computional methods : GEOMETRY and VORONOI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. I find that the nodes of seamlines generated by method "GEOMETRY " and "VORONOI" are very close. So I am wondering whether the GEOMETRY method is actually done through optimization of the result of VORONOI method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Whether the VORONOI method is similar with the AVDO algorithm proposed by PanJun (&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/discussion/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2253110" style="color: #2989c5; text-decoration: none;"&gt;DOI&lt;/A&gt;: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2253110) or they are just the same approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/people/jdrisdelle-esristaff"&gt;jdrisdelle-esristaff&lt;/A&gt;‌ &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/people/1_jian"&gt;1_jian&lt;/A&gt;‌ Could you please give me some advice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jianan He&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jiananhe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-02T01:05:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mosaic Dataset : Build Seamlines : Computional Method</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaic-dataset-build-seamlines-computional-method/m-p/644776#M36470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When building Seamlines for a Mosaic Dataset, there are computional methods : GEOMETRY and VORONOI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. I find that the nodes of seamlines generated by method "GEOMETRY " and "VORONOI" are very close. So I am wondering whether the GEOMETRY method is actually done through optimization of the result of VORONOI method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Whether the VORONOI method is similar with the AVDO algorithm proposed by PanJun (&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/discussion/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2253110" style="color: #2989c5; text-decoration: none;"&gt;DOI&lt;/A&gt;: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2253110) or they are just the same approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/people/jdrisdelle-esristaff"&gt;jdrisdelle-esristaff&lt;/A&gt;‌ &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/people/1_jian"&gt;1_jian&lt;/A&gt;‌ Could you please give me some advice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jianan He&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 01:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaic-dataset-build-seamlines-computional-method/m-p/644776#M36470</guid>
      <dc:creator>jiananhe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-02T01:05:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

