<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDE - Database Design in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642652#M36321</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Databases have an inherently "flat" organization. This is one of their strengths, since there &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;are significant performance benefits to not being able to "lose" a table in an arbitrary folder&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;organization. Esri honors this external design constraint with the ArcSDE interface -- there &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;is just one SE_table_list() function.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore, you have three sources of control: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Database instance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Database user (schema)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Table name&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Feature datasets should only be used to manage objects which will be edited togther&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(even though it is common, there are serious penalties for using FDS as a simple folder).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since Oracle doesn't have a "multi-database" paradigm, Esri engineered "schema geodatabases"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to isolate all the tables for a given user within an instance. Using this construct can also&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;mean more connections, since accesses to the different schemas all require their own &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;connections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I generally use table owner to reflect the provider or geographic extent, then use underscores &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to partition the name by theme (and I tack on the map scale and geometry class as suffixes):&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; sdelist -o table
 
ArcSDE 9.3 Table Listing Utility&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tue Sep 21 11:28:48 2010
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eval93.europe.admin1_100k_a
eval93.europe.cities_100k_p
eval93.europe.country_100k_a
eval93.europe.rail_100k_s
eval93.europe.railstations_100k_p
eval93.europe.roads_100k_s
eval93.usa.admin1_100k_a
eval93.usa.admin1_1m_a
eval93.usa.admin2_100k_a
eval93.usa.admin2_1m_a
eval93.usa.airport_100k_p
eval93.usa.cities_100k_p
eval93.usa.cities_1m_p
eval93.usa.hydro_100k_l
eval93.usa.hydro_1m_l
eval93.usa.rail_100k_l
eval93.usa.roads_100k_l
eval93.usa.roads_1m_l
eval93.usa.roads_500k_l
eval93.world.admin1_100k_a
eval93.world.cities_1m_p
eval93.world.country_100k_a
eval93.world.country_5m_a
eval93.world.gazateer_100k_p
eval93.world.nightlights_5km
eval93.world.wsi_earth99_4km
26 tables found
 
&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2021 03:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-12T03:18:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDE - Database Design</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642650#M36319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need some tips how to get my data organized very well in a sde so that you don�??t loose track in hundreds of feature classes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes it is possible to use Feature Datasets but somehow this is not enough. I have to divide thematically (energy supply, ground-contaminated land, terrain modelling, base map, historical monuments, aerial photos, and so on) and assign privileges. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Additionally there is a possible target to design Topology rules.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Until now we worked with PGDBs and we were able to group the data in PGDB and Feature Datasets. Like folders in a file system.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But how do you do this in the SDE?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642650#M36319</guid>
      <dc:creator>gismoe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T08:58:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE - Database Design</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642651#M36320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you can use several sde instances&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642651#M36320</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexanderDorofeev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T13:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE - Database Design</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642652#M36321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Databases have an inherently "flat" organization. This is one of their strengths, since there &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;are significant performance benefits to not being able to "lose" a table in an arbitrary folder&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;organization. Esri honors this external design constraint with the ArcSDE interface -- there &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;is just one SE_table_list() function.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Therefore, you have three sources of control: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Database instance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Database user (schema)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+ Table name&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Feature datasets should only be used to manage objects which will be edited togther&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(even though it is common, there are serious penalties for using FDS as a simple folder).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since Oracle doesn't have a "multi-database" paradigm, Esri engineered "schema geodatabases"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to isolate all the tables for a given user within an instance. Using this construct can also&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;mean more connections, since accesses to the different schemas all require their own &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;connections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I generally use table owner to reflect the provider or geographic extent, then use underscores &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to partition the name by theme (and I tack on the map scale and geometry class as suffixes):&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;C:\Temp&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; sdelist -o table
 
ArcSDE 9.3 Table Listing Utility&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tue Sep 21 11:28:48 2010
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eval93.europe.admin1_100k_a
eval93.europe.cities_100k_p
eval93.europe.country_100k_a
eval93.europe.rail_100k_s
eval93.europe.railstations_100k_p
eval93.europe.roads_100k_s
eval93.usa.admin1_100k_a
eval93.usa.admin1_1m_a
eval93.usa.admin2_100k_a
eval93.usa.admin2_1m_a
eval93.usa.airport_100k_p
eval93.usa.cities_100k_p
eval93.usa.cities_1m_p
eval93.usa.hydro_100k_l
eval93.usa.hydro_1m_l
eval93.usa.rail_100k_l
eval93.usa.roads_100k_l
eval93.usa.roads_1m_l
eval93.usa.roads_500k_l
eval93.world.admin1_100k_a
eval93.world.cities_1m_p
eval93.world.country_100k_a
eval93.world.country_5m_a
eval93.world.gazateer_100k_p
eval93.world.nightlights_5km
eval93.world.wsi_earth99_4km
26 tables found
 
&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2021 03:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-database-design/m-p/642652#M36321</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-12T03:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

