<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Problem with PostGreSQL Tables in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635632#M35926</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just because PostgreSQL doesn't think the geometry isn't invalid doesn't mean that the geometry constructors will agree.&amp;nbsp; Tech Support can help you track down this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-05T16:26:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problem with PostGreSQL Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635628#M35922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have something very strange happening. There are two particular spatial tables in a PostGreSQL database that I cannot get to function 100% correctly in ArcGIS. Basically I can get them into ArcMap as query layers like all the others, but I can't open the attribute tables of these two in particular. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I try to open the attribute table of one I get "The number of points is less than required for feature" and the other says "Linestring or poly boundary is self-intersecting". The table opens with the correct number of columns and rows, but it is completely blank. I know the data is in there because I can change symbology to be dependent on an attribute in the table, I just cannot get the table to open. If I export them and add them as shapefiles, they work fine. It's mind boggling that only two layers would behave this way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas how I might fix them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635628#M35922</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattBull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-04T19:20:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with PostGreSQL Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635629#M35923</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this table support mutliple topology classes (point and line and polygon)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Query Layers use the first found topology class for rendering rules.&amp;nbsp; Are all of your geometries clean with respect to that first found topology class?&amp;nbsp; Bowtie and other degenerate features can be dumped into shapefiles and rendered, but FGDB, ArcSDE, and QueryLayers are held to a higher topology standard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does "&lt;STRONG style="font-family: 'courier new', courier;"&gt;SELECT ST_IsValid(geomcol) FROM tablename&lt;/STRONG&gt;" return?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635629#M35923</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-04T19:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with PostGreSQL Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635630#M35924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I repaired the geometries of the two tables in question, and re-uploaded them to our PostGreSQL server and the same two errors came up when I tried to open the attribute tables. When I run the script you posted, several of the features appear to have invalid geometries, but they display fine in ArcMap, I can even look at the properties of the columns in the attribute table and they are correct, it's just the attribute information disappears completely when I open the attribute table. It is only two of the features. There are several others that are very similar in the same schema that work 100% fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:16:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635630#M35924</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattBull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-05T15:16:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with PostGreSQL Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635631#M35925</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;UPDATE: The two tables in question are behaving normally in ArcCatalog, I can preview the geometry and the attribute table without any problems. I think there is something going on specifically in ArcMap that is causing the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635631#M35925</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattBull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-05T15:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with PostGreSQL Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635632#M35926</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just because PostgreSQL doesn't think the geometry isn't invalid doesn't mean that the geometry constructors will agree.&amp;nbsp; Tech Support can help you track down this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problem-with-postgresql-tables/m-p/635632#M35926</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-05T16:26:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

