<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best practices for managing CONNECTIONS parameter in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-practices-for-managing-connections-parameter/m-p/616555#M34791</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The CONNECTIONS parameter at 9.3+ reflects both application server and Direct Connect &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;conections.&amp;nbsp; I've yet to be able to convince a Windows host to accept more than ~117&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;application server connections without running out of non-interactive desktop heap (I ran&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;equivalent Linux hardware to 400 application connections in a fraction of the time), so I'll &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;assume you're mostly using Direct Connect.&amp;nbsp; It's really up to the database on how many&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;connections to accept, and the server host to perform adequately under load.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You will hit a limit at some point, and it will likely become obvious when you do; unfortunately,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;there may not be much warning before performance goes into a death spiral.&amp;nbsp; For the meantime, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you can keep an eye on things by establishing an evaluation test to be done weekly, during a &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;point in time where the system is under "normal" load, which captures both number of connected&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;users and the time to accomplish a medium difficulty process; it's easier to justify infrastructure&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;improvements when you have data to back up your request.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-05T12:09:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practices for managing CONNECTIONS parameter</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-practices-for-managing-connections-parameter/m-p/616554#M34790</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We've recently quadrupled the number of connections to the geodatabase (SDE 9.3.1 SQL Server 2008) because we added another server for load balancing our ArcGIS Server services.&amp;nbsp; Plus we have an identical configuration for a staging area.&amp;nbsp; We had the CONNECTIONS parameter set to 200, but that wasn't enough. It was arbitrarily bumped up to&amp;nbsp; 400.&amp;nbsp; Is there a better way to manage all these connections or can we just keep bumping up the parameter setting with impunity?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-practices-for-managing-connections-parameter/m-p/616554#M34790</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrynEnright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-04T19:56:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practices for managing CONNECTIONS parameter</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-practices-for-managing-connections-parameter/m-p/616555#M34791</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The CONNECTIONS parameter at 9.3+ reflects both application server and Direct Connect &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;conections.&amp;nbsp; I've yet to be able to convince a Windows host to accept more than ~117&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;application server connections without running out of non-interactive desktop heap (I ran&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;equivalent Linux hardware to 400 application connections in a fraction of the time), so I'll &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;assume you're mostly using Direct Connect.&amp;nbsp; It's really up to the database on how many&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;connections to accept, and the server host to perform adequately under load.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You will hit a limit at some point, and it will likely become obvious when you do; unfortunately,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;there may not be much warning before performance goes into a death spiral.&amp;nbsp; For the meantime, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you can keep an eye on things by establishing an evaluation test to be done weekly, during a &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;point in time where the system is under "normal" load, which captures both number of connected&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;users and the time to accomplish a medium difficulty process; it's easier to justify infrastructure&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;improvements when you have data to back up your request.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-practices-for-managing-connections-parameter/m-p/616555#M34791</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-05T12:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

