<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Volumes using Cut/Fill in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/volumes-using-cut-fill/m-p/610294#M34409</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;we were recently asked to calculate the volume of a geological layer as part of a site investigation.&amp;nbsp; when exploring different options we were confused when we found that two different methods which, we think, should produce the same volume varied quite a lot and so wondered whether a) we were wrong or b) it was a product of the way Arc performs the calculations.&amp;nbsp; The first method was to interpolate two different surfaces of ground elevations at the top and bottom of the layer and use cut fill to create a volume.&amp;nbsp; The second method was to generate a constant raster with a value of 0 and then use the thickness of the layer (top surface minus bottom surface) to perform the cut/fill operation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any suggestions/ideas are welcome.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Rob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobMillman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-14T14:05:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Volumes using Cut/Fill</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/volumes-using-cut-fill/m-p/610294#M34409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;we were recently asked to calculate the volume of a geological layer as part of a site investigation.&amp;nbsp; when exploring different options we were confused when we found that two different methods which, we think, should produce the same volume varied quite a lot and so wondered whether a) we were wrong or b) it was a product of the way Arc performs the calculations.&amp;nbsp; The first method was to interpolate two different surfaces of ground elevations at the top and bottom of the layer and use cut fill to create a volume.&amp;nbsp; The second method was to generate a constant raster with a value of 0 and then use the thickness of the layer (top surface minus bottom surface) to perform the cut/fill operation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any suggestions/ideas are welcome.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Rob&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/volumes-using-cut-fill/m-p/610294#M34409</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobMillman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-14T14:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

