<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: GDB Versioning: How interactively resolve all differences, not only conflicts? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564814#M32018</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Chris. Last time I looked at ArcGIS Data Reviewer as an option it didn't deal well with the non-spatial aspects (related geodatabase tables and attachment tables). Maybe it's time for me to take another look at it, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 19:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TobiasFimpel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-13T19:23:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GDB Versioning: How interactively resolve all differences, not only conflicts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564812#M32016</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi. I'm somewhat new to Geodatabase Versioning, so I'm wondering how others do this: I want to interactively review and resolve &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;all&lt;/SPAN&gt; differences between a version and Default. This includes point/line/polygon features, geodatabase tables with relationships, and geodatabase attachments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scenario: field crews will be insert/update/deleting data via Collector app. Office staff needs to validate all edits before they go into the Default version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only solution I can think of so far is to make an edit to all data in Default just before reconcile and post (e.g. insert current datetime into a date field set up solely for this purpose) . That way all the edits in versions other than default will show as conflict. I'm sure there are better ways to do this. Are there?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd much&amp;nbsp; appreciate any suggestions. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(geodatabase version 10.3)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 17:57:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564812#M32016</guid>
      <dc:creator>TobiasFimpel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-13T17:57:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDB Versioning: How interactively resolve all differences, not only conflicts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564813#M32017</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not used this yet, but it may be of help:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcGIS Data Reviewer extension:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/extensions/arcgis-data-reviewer/key-features" title="http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/extensions/arcgis-data-reviewer/key-features"&gt;ArcGIS Data Reviewer | Key Features - Simplifying the QA/QC Process&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris Donohue, GISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 18:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564813#M32017</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisDonohue__GISP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-13T18:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GDB Versioning: How interactively resolve all differences, not only conflicts?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564814#M32018</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Chris. Last time I looked at ArcGIS Data Reviewer as an option it didn't deal well with the non-spatial aspects (related geodatabase tables and attachment tables). Maybe it's time for me to take another look at it, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 19:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/gdb-versioning-how-interactively-resolve-all/m-p/564814#M32018</guid>
      <dc:creator>TobiasFimpel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-13T19:23:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

