<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: extract to point bilinear interpolation in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/extract-to-point-bilinear-interpolation/m-p/563208#M31965</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other areas of the spatial analyst, the 4 nearest neighbours are used.... ie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/spatial-analyst/performing-analysis/cell-size-and-resampling-in-analysis.htm"&gt;http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/spatial-analyst/performing-analysis/cell-size-and-resampling-in-analysis.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, unless esri wanted to introduce some confusion into the mix, they would use the same approach or provide a caveat indicating otherwise. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And have you concern, or examples where this would be an issue in your work, or it for curiosity or clarity of method?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 21:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-06T21:16:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>extract to point bilinear interpolation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/extract-to-point-bilinear-interpolation/m-p/563207#M31964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know how the interpolation option for the tool Raster (extract to point) works. It says bilinear interpolation. So, does it take 4 or 9 neighbors into account?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/extract-to-point-bilinear-interpolation/m-p/563207#M31964</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnneTrampe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-06T21:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: extract to point bilinear interpolation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/extract-to-point-bilinear-interpolation/m-p/563208#M31965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other areas of the spatial analyst, the 4 nearest neighbours are used.... ie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/spatial-analyst/performing-analysis/cell-size-and-resampling-in-analysis.htm"&gt;http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/spatial-analyst/performing-analysis/cell-size-and-resampling-in-analysis.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, unless esri wanted to introduce some confusion into the mix, they would use the same approach or provide a caveat indicating otherwise. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And have you concern, or examples where this would be an issue in your work, or it for curiosity or clarity of method?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 21:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/extract-to-point-bilinear-interpolation/m-p/563208#M31965</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-06T21:16:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

