<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Table to Table Unnecessarily Truncates Names  in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/table-to-table-unnecessarily-truncates-names/m-p/561780#M31853</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running arcmap 10.7.1 windows 10 all latest patches etc etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running this tool:&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;Standard Toolbox =&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;Conversion Tools =&amp;gt; To geodatabase =&amp;gt; Table to Table&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My source is a feature class in a file geodatabase (&lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.gdb&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My output is a &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.csv&lt;/SPAN&gt; file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This&amp;nbsp;**** tool truncates my field names to 10 characters. Yes, if I were making a &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.dbf&lt;/SPAN&gt; table that truncation would be necessary. There is no such restriction in the length of field names in a .csv, none whatever. So why does it do it? Because&amp;nbsp; ESRI is not much concerned with the interoperability of their product with others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is, once again, typical. This software is on its umpteenth release. This kind of imprecision, lack of attention to detail, lack of desire to dot the i's and cross the t's, lack of motivation to not saddle the user with the burden of working around these issues; this what characterizes&amp;nbsp; ESRI's software. I swear that every day I use&amp;nbsp;arcmap I run into some new irritation&amp;nbsp;requiring me to interrupt my workflow while I have to code up yes another kluge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertStevens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-10T15:19:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Table to Table Unnecessarily Truncates Names</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/table-to-table-unnecessarily-truncates-names/m-p/561780#M31853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running arcmap 10.7.1 windows 10 all latest patches etc etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running this tool:&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;Standard Toolbox =&amp;gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;Conversion Tools =&amp;gt; To geodatabase =&amp;gt; Table to Table&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My source is a feature class in a file geodatabase (&lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.gdb&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My output is a &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.csv&lt;/SPAN&gt; file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This&amp;nbsp;**** tool truncates my field names to 10 characters. Yes, if I were making a &lt;SPAN style="color: #3366ff;"&gt;.dbf&lt;/SPAN&gt; table that truncation would be necessary. There is no such restriction in the length of field names in a .csv, none whatever. So why does it do it? Because&amp;nbsp; ESRI is not much concerned with the interoperability of their product with others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is, once again, typical. This software is on its umpteenth release. This kind of imprecision, lack of attention to detail, lack of desire to dot the i's and cross the t's, lack of motivation to not saddle the user with the burden of working around these issues; this what characterizes&amp;nbsp; ESRI's software. I swear that every day I use&amp;nbsp;arcmap I run into some new irritation&amp;nbsp;requiring me to interrupt my workflow while I have to code up yes another kluge.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/table-to-table-unnecessarily-truncates-names/m-p/561780#M31853</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertStevens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-10T15:19:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

