<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509297#M28919</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are several dozen possible tuning parameters (both Oracle- and ArcSDE-specific), and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;scores of configuration options for thousands of possible use cases.&amp;nbsp; I haven't ever changed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a tuning parameter that had a even a fraction of the positive impact of increasing the default&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1/10th millimeter precision of ArcGIS-generated coordinate references to something in the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;5 centimeter range.&amp;nbsp; Next most significant was optimizing the features in spatial index order.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All database tuning options (for all databases) pale in comparison to making sure the system&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;has robust I/O performance with multiple independent disks tuned to the database transfer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;blocksize, organizing the data to utilize parallelism in disk access, keeping the redo logs and&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;temp tablespace apart from each other and data tables, and organizing the data in the tables&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;for optimal query performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T10:49:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509295#M28917</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well, I am going to put a basic but straight question.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What parameters need to be tuned in ArcSDE and Oracle for optimal retrieval of spatial data ??&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using direct connect mode of SDE with Oracle DB.....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Nadeem&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509295#M28917</guid>
      <dc:creator>NadeemSufyan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T03:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509296#M28918</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Nadeem,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The link &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/geodatabase/10.0/install_guides/arcsde_for_oracle_installation_and_upgrade_guide/index.html#//009400000004000000"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; provides suggestions on Oracle's configuration for ArcSDE 10.&amp;nbsp; ArcSDE 9.3 can be found &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=Oracle_initialization_parameters"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509296#M28918</guid>
      <dc:creator>JakeSkinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T10:35:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509297#M28919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are several dozen possible tuning parameters (both Oracle- and ArcSDE-specific), and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;scores of configuration options for thousands of possible use cases.&amp;nbsp; I haven't ever changed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a tuning parameter that had a even a fraction of the positive impact of increasing the default&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1/10th millimeter precision of ArcGIS-generated coordinate references to something in the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;5 centimeter range.&amp;nbsp; Next most significant was optimizing the features in spatial index order.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All database tuning options (for all databases) pale in comparison to making sure the system&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;has robust I/O performance with multiple independent disks tuned to the database transfer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;blocksize, organizing the data to utilize parallelism in disk access, keeping the redo logs and&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;temp tablespace apart from each other and data tables, and organizing the data in the tables&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;for optimal query performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509297#M28919</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T10:49:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509298#M28920</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;the system has robust I/O performance with multiple independent disks tuned to the database transfer&lt;BR /&gt;blocksize, organizing the data to utilize parallelism in disk access, keeping the redo logs and&lt;BR /&gt;temp tablespace apart from each other and data tables, and organizing the data in the tables&lt;BR /&gt;for optimal query performance.&lt;BR /&gt;- V&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Vince, I would love to see an extensive whitepaper about these issues!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509298#M28920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pieter_Geertvan_den_Beukel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-06T05:49:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE tuning for Oracle 10g</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509299#M28921</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So would I, but I don't see the 300-400 hours it would take to write one opening up in my schedule&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;anytime soon.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-tuning-for-oracle-10g/m-p/509299#M28921</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-06T11:49:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

