<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Keeping statistics with multi-field dissolving in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491548#M27929</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late reply, I was on holiday and only came back into office today. The data is held non-public, so I'm held to not publish it... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was trying to get it into one table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dissolving it after multiple fields only worked with the segments, so indeed all the single track parts of line x and all the multi part tracks of line x as well as all the single track parts of line y and all the multi part tracks of line y and so on were aggregated as one part each. but the attribute table showed multi track for all of the 4 cases... And the calculated Statistics were only for one of the dissolving fileds, as mentioned above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know exactly what happened, but it seems the programm could't handle a dissolving process with 5 fields. But I could solve it with this workaround: creating a new field in the attribute table (text-type), calculated it as a comination of the 5 fields I wanted to dissolve after. Now I could use this field to dissolve after, and with only this one field all the statistics were calculated correctly!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 09:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JonasDanner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-03T09:17:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Keeping statistics with multi-field dissolving</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491546#M27927</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a tram-track layer with many single segments I want to dissolve by multiple fields, e.g. by tramline-number and if its a single-track or double-track segment of the tram. So alle the single-track parts of line 1 as one feature, all double track parts of line 1 as another feature, single track for line 2, double track for line 2 and so on. Choosing both fields (line number and Track type) as dissolving fields works fine for aggregation (no multipart-features).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But not for the statistics. I also want to sum the number of signals along each new feature. so I used the "number of signals" field in my attribute table as a statistic field, type sum. But the result is the same number of signals for each part of line 1, so single track for line 1 --&amp;gt; 16 signals, double track for line 1 --&amp;gt; 16 signals. But there are 16 signals along the whole line 1, it should be single track for line 1 --&amp;gt; 6 signals, double track for line 1 --&amp;gt; 10 signals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does someone know how to fix this? (it's not only those two lines, so I can't do it manually...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jonas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491546#M27927</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonasDanner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T08:25:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Keeping statistics with multi-field dissolving</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491547#M27928</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;maybe showing some portions of the sample tables would help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you trying to get this into one table or are you looking at how to efficiently set up a series of joins/relates?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 21:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491547#M27928</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-25T21:07:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Keeping statistics with multi-field dissolving</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491548#M27929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late reply, I was on holiday and only came back into office today. The data is held non-public, so I'm held to not publish it... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was trying to get it into one table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dissolving it after multiple fields only worked with the segments, so indeed all the single track parts of line x and all the multi part tracks of line x as well as all the single track parts of line y and all the multi part tracks of line y and so on were aggregated as one part each. but the attribute table showed multi track for all of the 4 cases... And the calculated Statistics were only for one of the dissolving fileds, as mentioned above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know exactly what happened, but it seems the programm could't handle a dissolving process with 5 fields. But I could solve it with this workaround: creating a new field in the attribute table (text-type), calculated it as a comination of the 5 fields I wanted to dissolve after. Now I could use this field to dissolve after, and with only this one field all the statistics were calculated correctly!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 09:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491548#M27929</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonasDanner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-03T09:17:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Keeping statistics with multi-field dissolving</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491549#M27930</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That would be the solution since it simplifies the dissolve to one case&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 11:20:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/keeping-statistics-with-multi-field-dissolving/m-p/491549#M27930</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-03T11:20:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

