<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDE Feature Class envelope (max x / y) too large in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479468#M27317</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Follow-up:&amp;nbsp; I did have a user report that they did attempt to insert data into a SDE Feature class from a shapefile &lt;EM&gt;that did not have a defined projection...&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; and then the extents changed radically.&amp;nbsp; That makes sense... well, the reason the extents changed... &lt;EM&gt;not as to why we have people still trying to use shapefiles with no projection definition - oh, the humanity!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Easy enough fix for the feature classes using the Property sheet in ArcCatalog or sdelayer -o alter -E for the topology layers (if affected)...&amp;nbsp; but does anyone with 10.3 know how to fix the topology layers extents without sdelayer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-18T21:03:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDE Feature Class envelope (max x / y) too large</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479466#M27315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 (sp2)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ArcSDE 10.1 (sp2) on Oracle 11.2.0.3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SUSE LINUX&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ST_Geometry storage type&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Editors working in protected versions that they own, SDE.Default is protected.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Data is all stored in GCS NAD 1983&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Occasionally our editors report that they are no longer able to display certain feature classes in ArcMap.&amp;nbsp; Typically it is because the spatial envelope of the feature class has been expanded to unrealistic values in the max-x and max-y for geographic...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Typical extents in our data:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Layer Envelope .......:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; minx:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -125.00000,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; miny:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 41.00000&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; maxx:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -116.00000,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; maxy:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 50.00000&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But sometimes we get max-x and max-y values of 500,000 or even over 1,000,000... certainly not likely values for degrees of latitude/longitude.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Resetting these values we know how do... I'd be curious if anyone knows what causes these envelopes to change to such values?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The editors are using standard ArcMap tools for entering geometry.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes they edit in the projection of the SDE data, sometime they switch the data frame to UTM.&amp;nbsp; Data loaded from other sources is typically via the copy/paste tools.&amp;nbsp; I've run several tests with source data in the 3 most common projections our user's would obtain data in, and matched those with common data frame projections they might edit in, but haven't been able to reproduce the change to the envelope values.&amp;nbsp; If anyone has seen this issue and found a possible cause we'd like to know...&amp;nbsp; I think we reset an envelope every couple of weeks on at least on of our 40+ editable feature classes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479466#M27315</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-29T16:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Feature Class envelope (max x / y) too large</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479467#M27316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Data loaded from other sources is typically via the copy/paste tools.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The statement above makes me wonder if there are occasions where data is loaded from other sources without using a copy/paste operation.&amp;nbsp; In other words, I am wondering if there are rare occasions where data is atypically loaded.&amp;nbsp; If there are &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style:italic;"&gt;any &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;other ways in which you load data besides copy/paste, please elaborate on what those are.&amp;nbsp; We have seen similar behavior in the past, and we narrowed it down to a CAD converter tool that we use to load data into our edit versions.&amp;nbsp; To date, we have not truly resolved the issue although it does not happen often.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479467#M27316</guid>
      <dc:creator>WilliamCraft</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-04T20:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Feature Class envelope (max x / y) too large</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479468#M27317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Follow-up:&amp;nbsp; I did have a user report that they did attempt to insert data into a SDE Feature class from a shapefile &lt;EM&gt;that did not have a defined projection...&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; and then the extents changed radically.&amp;nbsp; That makes sense... well, the reason the extents changed... &lt;EM&gt;not as to why we have people still trying to use shapefiles with no projection definition - oh, the humanity!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Easy enough fix for the feature classes using the Property sheet in ArcCatalog or sdelayer -o alter -E for the topology layers (if affected)...&amp;nbsp; but does anyone with 10.3 know how to fix the topology layers extents without sdelayer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sde-feature-class-envelope-max-x-y-too-large/m-p/479468#M27317</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-18T21:03:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

