<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Different UTM zones in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448787#M25670</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No, all data in any single table must be in *one* projection. You must reproject all data &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;into a common projection.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-04T13:18:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different UTM zones</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448784#M25667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Good evening my friend!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are developing a GIS project for the state government of Bahia / Brazil. The problem is that our state is divided into two UTM zones 23/24. I wonder when it comes to 10 ArcSDE and Oracle 11g, if we could model the database using a table for each entity and if you have any examples.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 01:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448784#M25667</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvertonParaguassú_da_Silva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-04T01:11:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different UTM zones</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448785#M25668</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;UTM zones exist because, once you get toward the edges, the error becomes unacceptable&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;for high precision tasks.&amp;nbsp; There is still room for lower precision tasks ~2-3 degrees into the&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;neighboring zone, but you might be better off using an Albers projection which covers your&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;area of interest properly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I don't recommend you split your data across two different zones,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;then try to align them on the fly. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 10:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448785#M25668</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-04T10:54:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different UTM zones</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448786#M25669</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;UTM zones exist because, once you get toward the edges, the error becomes unacceptable&lt;BR /&gt;for high precision tasks.&amp;nbsp; There is still room for lower precision tasks ~2-3 degrees into the&lt;BR /&gt;neighboring zone, but you might be better off using an Albers projection which covers your&lt;BR /&gt;area of interest properly.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I don't recommend you split your data across two different zones,&lt;BR /&gt;then try to align them on the fly. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;- V&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I wold like to know if you have a modeling case about the problem outlined ? Today we are splitting into two Feature Class for example:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PGO_Municiple_23 (all municiples contained in zone 23) and PGO_Municiple_24 (all municiples contained in zone 24) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But i would like to store in only one Feature. I would like to know if i can store two UTM zones in the same Feature Class.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;bests regards.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448786#M25669</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvertonParaguassú_da_Silva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-04T12:59:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different UTM zones</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448787#M25670</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No, all data in any single table must be in *one* projection. You must reproject all data &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;into a common projection.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:18:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/different-utm-zones/m-p/448787#M25670</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-04T13:18:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

