<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lesson Learned:  Cache job distributed over multiple machines - FAIL! in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422412#M24130</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did not try this in an earlier version.&amp;nbsp; Using multiple machines in the 10.1 lead to serious performance issues (from what I'm told), so I waited until now to try it in 10.2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reluctant to upgrade other servers to 10.2 with all the issues I'm seeing on my test machines.&amp;nbsp; I'm actually getting more failures with cache on 10.2 than 10.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an aside, I've also tested map service response times with 2 machines on a site vs. one machine using 10.2.2.&amp;nbsp; It seems that using 2 machines costs an extra 10-25% in latency (on my network, anyways).&amp;nbsp; So while a multi-machine site may be able to handle a greater volume of requests, performance takes a hit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamieHammermann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-11T18:42:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lesson Learned:  Cache job distributed over multiple machines - FAIL!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422410#M24128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attempted to run a cache over 2 machines on the default cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using ArcGIS 10.2.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My scale levels were 0-12.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caching ran fine on levels 0, 4, 8, &amp;amp; 11.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No errors were thrown, but Empty tiles were created in the rest of the levels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone have success caching over multiple machines?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422410#M24128</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamieHammermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-11T15:43:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lesson Learned:  Cache job distributed over multiple machines - FAIL!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422411#M24129</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jamie:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you ever attempt to run a cache over 2 machines in an earlier AGS environment?&amp;nbsp; I ask because other AGS users at v10.2.2 were having cache issues which did not occur in an earlier version such as v10.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Although I did not create the caches myself, 5 cache layers were successfully created in my v10.0 production environment which consists of 2 load-balanced ArcGIS Server servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422411#M24129</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-11T16:29:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lesson Learned:  Cache job distributed over multiple machines - FAIL!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422412#M24130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did not try this in an earlier version.&amp;nbsp; Using multiple machines in the 10.1 lead to serious performance issues (from what I'm told), so I waited until now to try it in 10.2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reluctant to upgrade other servers to 10.2 with all the issues I'm seeing on my test machines.&amp;nbsp; I'm actually getting more failures with cache on 10.2 than 10.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an aside, I've also tested map service response times with 2 machines on a site vs. one machine using 10.2.2.&amp;nbsp; It seems that using 2 machines costs an extra 10-25% in latency (on my network, anyways).&amp;nbsp; So while a multi-machine site may be able to handle a greater volume of requests, performance takes a hit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/lesson-learned-cache-job-distributed-over-multiple/m-p/422412#M24130</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamieHammermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-11T18:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

