<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Field Calculator and Base Tables in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/field-calculator-and-base-tables/m-p/417656#M23827</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edits to a versioned table, even one set to "move edits to base", go through the A/D tables.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I once had a customer who was tweaking network weighting values on a large (200k rows) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;table and was complaining about poor performance -- If turns out they had 30 million rows&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;in both the An and Dn tables.&amp;nbsp; I recommended they put modeling constants in a joined table,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;one edited with an ODBC connection.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-03T11:19:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Field Calculator and Base Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/field-calculator-and-base-tables/m-p/417655#M23826</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi All,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone know when using the Field Calculator in ArcMap, does that make the modifications to the A &amp;amp; D tables in ArcSDE or to the Base tables?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I ask because we used the Field Calculator, hit Save Edits and then the Conflicts window appeared.&amp;nbsp; Generally you only get this after you have performed a reconcile - which had NOT been done.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are using ArcMap version 9.3.1 and ArcSDE 9.3.1 in SQL Server 2008.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Laura&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/field-calculator-and-base-tables/m-p/417655#M23826</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraCarr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-02T21:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Field Calculator and Base Tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/field-calculator-and-base-tables/m-p/417656#M23827</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Edits to a versioned table, even one set to "move edits to base", go through the A/D tables.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I once had a customer who was tweaking network weighting values on a large (200k rows) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;table and was complaining about poor performance -- If turns out they had 30 million rows&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;in both the An and Dn tables.&amp;nbsp; I recommended they put modeling constants in a joined table,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;one edited with an ODBC connection.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- V&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/field-calculator-and-base-tables/m-p/417656#M23827</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-03T11:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

